【24h】

Investigation of Strut Strength Using a Deep-Beam Database

机译:使用深光束数据库研究支撑强度

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Data from 360 deep beam tests was collected from available literature to perform a strut-and-tie model analysis on each of the beams using a simple deep beam strut-and-tie model. The capacities of bottle-shaped struts in the deep beam strut-and-tie models determined from experimental testing were compared with predicted strut strengths specified by ACI 318-08 and AASHTO LRFD Bridge Design Specifications (AASHTO 2007). For AASHTO LRFD, the comparisons showed that the strut stress provisions are unconservative for concrete strengths greater than 7000 psi (48 MPa). For ACI 318-08, the comparisons showed that the strut stress provisions are unconservative for concrete strengths less than 6000 psi (41 MPa) when used with the minimum amount of crack control reinforcement specified by ACI 318-08 and for concrete strengths greater than 6000 psi (41 MPa) for any amount of crack control reinforcement. Based on these findings, new strut strength provisions were developed for ACI 318-08 and AASHTO LRFD that provided increased conservatism.
机译:从现有文献中收集了来自360个深梁测试的数据,以使用简单的深梁撑杆式模型对每个梁进行撑杆式模型分析。将通过实验测试确定的深梁支杆式模型中的瓶形支杆的能力与ACI 318-08和AASHTO LRFD桥梁设计规范(AASHTO 2007)指定的预计支杆强度进行了比较。对于AASHTO LRFD,比较表明,对于大于7000 psi(48 MPa)的混凝土强度,支柱应力规定是不保守的。对于ACI 318-08,比较结果表明,当混凝土强度小于6000 psi(41 MPa)且使用ACI 318-08指定的最小量的防裂增强筋以及大于6000的混凝土强度时,支柱应力规定是不保守的psi(41 MPa)适用于任何数量的防裂加固。基于这些发现,为ACI 318-08和AASHTO LRFD开发了新的支撑强度规定,从而增加了保守性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号