首页> 外文会议>Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 2018 annual meeting >Looking Beyond the Gesture: Vocabulary Acceptability Criteria for Gesture Elicitation Studies
【24h】

Looking Beyond the Gesture: Vocabulary Acceptability Criteria for Gesture Elicitation Studies

机译:超越手势:手势启发研究的词汇接受标准

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

The choice of what gestures should be part of a gesture language is a critical step in the design of gesture-based interfaces. This step is especially important when time and accuracy are key factors of the user expe-rience, such as gestural interfaces in vehicle control and sterile control of a picture archiving and communi-cation system (PACS) in the operating room (OR). Agreement studies are commonly used to find the gesture preference of the end users. These studies hypothesize that the best available gesture lexicon is the one pre-ferred by a majority. However, these agreement approaches cannot offer a metric to assess the qualitative aspects of gestures. In this work, we propose an experimental framework to quantify, compare and evaluate gestures. This framework is grounded in the expert knowledge of speech and language professionals (SLPs). The development consisted of three studies: 1) Creation, 2) Evaluation and 3) Validation. In the creation study, we followed an adapted version of the Delphi’s interview/discussion procedure with SLPs. The pur-pose was to obtain the Vocabulary Acceptability Criteria (VAC) to evaluate gestures. Next, in the evaluation study, a modified method of pairwise comparisons was used to rank and quantify the gestures based on each criteria (VAC). Lastly, in the validation study, we formulated an odd one out procedure, to prove that the VAC values of a gesture are representative and sufficiently distinctive, to select that particular gesture from a pool of gestures. We applied this framework to the gestures obtained from a gesture elicitation study con-ducted with nine neurosurgeons, to control an imaging software. In addition, 29 SLPs comprising of 17 ex-perts and 12 graduate students participated in the VAC study. The best lexicons from the available pool were obtained through both agreement and VAC metrics. We used binomial tests to show that the results obtained from the validation procedure are significantly better than the baseline. These results verify our hypothesis that the VAC are representative of the gestures and the subjects should be able to select the right gesture given its VAC values.
机译:在基于手势的界面的设计中,选择哪些手势应成为手势语言的一部分是至关重要的一步。当时间和准确性是用户体验的关键因素时(例如,车辆控制中的手势界面以及手术室(OR)中的图片存档和通信系统(PACS)的无菌控制),此步骤尤其重要。协议研究通常用于查找最终用户的手势偏好。这些研究假设,最好的可用手势词典是大多数人推崇的词典。但是,这些协议方法不能提供一种评估手势质量方面的指标。在这项工作中,我们提出了一个实验框架来量化,比较和评估手势。该框架基于语音和语言专业人员(SLP)的专业知识。开发包括三项研究:1)创建,2)评估和3)验证。在创作研究中,我们遵循了SLP对Delphi采访/讨论程序的改编版本。目的是获得词汇可接受性标准(VAC)以评估手势。接下来,在评估研究中,使用了一种改进的成对比较方法,用于基于每个标准(VAC)对手势进行排名和量化。最后,在验证研究中,我们制定了一个奇数单出程序,以证明手势的VAC值具有代表性且足够独特,可以从手势池中选择该特定手势。我们将此框架应用于从9位神经外科医师进行的手势启发研究中获得的手势,以控制成像软件。此外,由17名专家和12名研究生组成的29个SLP参加了VAC研究。通过协议和VAC指标都可以从可用池中获得最佳词典。我们使用二项式检验表明,从验证过程中获得的结果明显优于基线。这些结果证实了我们的假设,即VAC代表手势,并且在给定其VAC值的情况下,受试者应该能够选择正确的手势。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号