首页> 外文会议>Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 2018 annual meeting >MEASURING SATISFACTION WITH STANDARD SURVEY INSTRUMENTS AND SINGLE-BUTTON RESPONSES ON KIOSKS
【24h】

MEASURING SATISFACTION WITH STANDARD SURVEY INSTRUMENTS AND SINGLE-BUTTON RESPONSES ON KIOSKS

机译:使用标准调查仪器和单按钮响应来衡量满意程度

获取原文

摘要

User satisfaction with a technology is an essential usability metric. Unlike efficiency and effectiveness,which are generally recorded during use, satisfaction is often measured subsequently using questionnaires,such as the modified version of the system usability scale (MSUS). This makes satisfaction the most costlyusability measure to acquire in large-scale testing. To mitigate this cost, we compared the performance of afour-button kiosk with a standard SUS instrument for measuring satisfaction. Three hundred and fifty fourdemographically diverse subjects used the kiosk and completed a SUS questionnaire immediately afterusing one of two different alternative technologies. Kiosk ratings took only 11.43 (sd = 7.30) seconds onaverage to collect, much faster than 1200 seconds on average for the SUS. Kiosk ratings and MSUS scoreswere strongly correlated (r = 0.62, p < .005), showing the same pattern of differences between the testedtechnologies. However, the index of dispersion for kiosk ratings was 71.74% larger than for MSUS scores.We conclude that satisfaction kiosks are a cost-effective alternative for measuring satisfaction in usabilitystudies with large sample sizes.
机译:用户对技术的满意度是必不可少的可用性指标。与效率和效力不同, 通常在使用过程中记录下来,满意度通常是在随后使用问卷调查来衡量的, 例如系统可用性量表(MSUS)的修改版本。这使满意度最昂贵 在大规模测试中获取的可用性度量。为了减轻这种成本,我们比较了 带标准SUS仪器的四按钮信息亭,用于评估满意度。三百五十四 人口统计学差异的受试者在使用信息亭后立即完成了SUS调查问卷 使用两种不同的替代技术之一。信息亭的评分仅花费了11.43(sd = 7.30)秒 平均收集时间,远远快于SUS的平均1200秒。信息亭评级和MSUS分数 高度相关(r = 0.62,p <.005),显示了测试之间的相同差异模式 技术。但是,信息亭等级的分散指数比MSUS得分高71.74%。 我们得出结论,满意度亭是衡量可用性满意度的一种经济有效的选择 样本量大的研究。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号