【24h】

A Method for Determining the Objective Weights of Experts Based on Evidence Similarity in Group Decision-making

机译:群体决策中基于证据相似度的专家客观权重确定方法

获取原文

摘要

Dempster–Shafer theory of evidence is used to quantify uncertainty in terms of the uncertain measures of belief and plausibility. It can better handle the synthesis of fuzzy and uncertain information. So it can deal with the different experts' opinions as evidence and integrate them to make decision for the decision-makers in group decision-making. But when the differences among the experts' opinions are great, the combination result is often inconsistent with the facts. This paper presents a method determining the objective weights of experts based on evidence similarity. This method determines the weights of experts' opinions according to the evidence similarity to re-adjust the basic probability assignments of the experts' evidence, which can reduce the weight of the expert whose opinions are wide divergent to others'. A study about the supplier selection problem is applied to verify the effectiveness of the proposed method.
机译:Dempster–Shafer证据理论用于根据不确定性的信念和合理性来量化不确定性。它可以更好地处理模糊和不确定信息的综合。因此,它可以处理不同专家的观点作为证据,并将它们整合起来,以便在小组决策中为决策者做出决策。但是,当专家意见分歧很大时,合并结果往往与事实不一致。本文提出了一种基于证据相似度确定专家客观权重的方法。该方法根据证据相似度确定专家意见的权重,以重新调整专家证据的基本概率分配,从而可以减轻意见分歧较大的专家的权重。通过对供应商选择问题的研究,验证了该方法的有效性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号