首页> 外文会议>System development and asset management under restructuring >DEVELOPMENT STRATEGIES OF THE RELIABLE POWER SYSTEMS
【24h】

DEVELOPMENT STRATEGIES OF THE RELIABLE POWER SYSTEMS

机译:可靠电力系统的发展策略

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

The power system blackout usually goes through two stages. Stage one is related to voltage collapse/transient instability. The reason why most of the instability had happened in the complex and unreliable system configuration, is because of the power grids interconnections and power transmission are liberalized. They become irregular through arbitrary transmission paths. Their power system configuration is subject to an un-controlled condition in case of system disturbances.rnWhile in stage 2, the instability may spread out to "blackout" when the system integrity could not be maintained. Two different strategies exist on how to handle the system instability. The first strategy is from the American NERC Planning Standards. The standards say that "Generation and transmission protection systems should avoid tripping for stable swings on the interconnected systems" , that means the operations of protection tripping the generation and transmission systems are permitted during instability. The consequence is blackout. The second is from the rule of "Three Lines of Defense" in China, i.e. keeping system integrity during instability. The blackout can be avoided.rnThis rule in China is based on close examinations of blackouts all over the world, especially the experience of the North American Blackout in 1965. It was concluded as "The cause of cascading blackouts - Un-controlled power system configuration and protection." Hence for more than 20 years of building proper AC/DC system configuration and to keep system integrity, system instability may occasionally occur, but it could not cascade to widespread blackout, also any disturbance occurred in one region could not spread out to other regions because of HVDC interconnection. Therefore, both the reliable system configuration with sufficient reactive power support as well as maintaining system integrity should be established as the Defense Plan against extreme contingencies to avoid blackout.rnThe rapid power demand growth has been driving the AC systems to extend, also with the introduction of higher voltage levels, above 1000 kV, however, the feasibility of its application has to be studied.rnHVDC has become a mature and reliable technology by the replacement of mercury arc valves to thyristors with digital control in 1980s. New VSC HVDC technology has been developed since 1999, which has the ability to integrate seamlessly into an AC system with improved stability and highest level of controllability for multi-terminal HVDC.rnDevelopment Strategies - Well-coordinated AC/DC configuration will result with more economical and technical benefits. To day, our particular notice is in the ability of HVDC to control power flow, and prevent propagation of severe disturbances, thus limiting instability extension.rnNew HVDC technology will be further developed for use not only for long distance power transmission and interconnection between AC systems, it is anticipative for use as backbone instead of AC UHV The America [GRID 2030 VISION] is an example; it would be a National Vision for Electricity in Second 100 years. The European [Super grid] has been proposed which will be another example.rnAccording to the United Nation document: "Above 1000 kV, however, the practical difficulty and expense of equipment and insulation that can withstand such high voltages becomes prohibitive." If AC UHV system is developed, it must overlay many existing EHV systems with much wider area, all the complicate problems could not be controlled and would be cascaded to blackout the whole area.rnAccording to technical and economical comparison, 1000kV line is not as good as HVDC line for long distance transmission; it is also not as good as the lines of a 500kV double circuit compact tower for short and middle distance transmission. The security and environmental protection of 1000kV lines is particularly much worse than that of both HVDC and 500kV lines. Therefore, AC UHV has no value in use for transmission.
机译:电力系统停电通常经历两个阶段。第一阶段与电压崩溃/瞬态不稳定性有关。大多数不稳定发生在复杂且不可靠的系统配置中的原因是由于电网互连和电力传输被放开。它们通过任意传输路径变得不规则。他们的电力系统配置会在系统受到干扰的情况下处于不受控制的状态。虽然在阶段2中,当无法保持系统完整性时,不稳定可能会扩散到“停电”状态。关于如何处理系统不稳定,存在两种不同的策略。第一项策略来自美国NERC规划标准。该标准说:“发电和输电保护系统应避免跳闸,以确保互连系统上的稳定波动”,这意味着在不稳定期间,允许跳闸发电和输电系统的保护操作。结果是停电。第二个是来自中国的“三道防线”规则,即在不稳定期间保持系统完整性。在中国,此规则基于对世界范围内停电的仔细检查,尤其是1965年北美停电的经验。结论是“停电的原因是级联-电力系统配置不受控制”和保护。”因此,在建立正确的AC / DC系统配置20多年并保持系统完整性的过程中,有时可能会发生系统不稳定,但它无法级联到大范围的停电,而且在一个区域中发生的任何干扰都无法传播到其他区域,因为HVDC互连。因此,应将具有足够的无功功率支持的可靠系统配置以及保持系统完整性作为防御极端突发事件的防御计划,以避免停电。rn功率需求的快速增长推动了交流系统的扩展,并且随着引入然而,对于更高电压等级(高于1000 kV)的应用,必须研究其应用的可行性。高压直流输电已成为成熟而可靠的技术,在1980年代通过数字控制将汞弧阀替换为晶闸管。自1999年以来已开发出新的VSC HVDC技术,该技术能够无缝集成到交流系统中,具有更高的稳定性和最高水平的多端子HVDC可控性。rn发展策略-协调的AC / DC配置将带来更经济的效果和技术利益。如今,我们特别注意到的是HVDC能够控制功率流并防止严重干扰的传播,从而限制了不稳定性的扩展。rn将会进一步开发新的HVDC技术,不仅用于交流系统之间的长距离输电和互连,它有望代替AC UHV用作骨干网。美国[GRID 2030 VISION]是一个例子;这将是第二个100年的国家电力愿景。已经提出了欧洲[超级电网],这将是另一个例子。根据联合国文件:“但是,在1000 kV以上,承受这种高压的设备和绝缘的实际困难和费用变得过高。”如果发展交流特高压系统,它必须覆盖许多现有的超高压系统,其面积要大得多,所有复杂的问题都无法控制,并且会被级联起来,从而使整个地区都蒙受损失。根据技术和经济上的比较,1000kV线路还不如作为高压直流输电线路,用于远距离传输;它也不如用于中短距离传输的500kV双回路紧凑型塔架的线路好。 1000kV线路的安全性和环保性比HVDC和500kV线路的安全性和环保性特别差。因此,AC UHV没有任何价值可用于传输。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号