【24h】

Distance Graphs Whose Chromatic Number is Affected by the Underlying Set Theory

机译:色数受底层集合理论影响的距离图

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Much of mathematics, including Graph Theory, is built on the foundation of ZFC set theory. However there are other foundations and the choice of ZFC might be just a historical coincidence. In particular, ZFS foundation in many respects is "better" or as "good" as ZFC foundation: it allows a complete Lebesgue measure theory and hence analysis and physics might be built on ZFS foundation; but on the other hand it eliminates anomalies such as Banach-Tarsky paradox. The Shelah-Soifer class 5 of graphs illustrates how different mathematics could be if it were built on a different foundation. This provokes numerous questions, in particular: 1. What if we try to continue the Solovay's project and build analysis on top of ZFS? 2. How different this ZFS-analysis would be? 3. Would the physics from the point of .ZFS-analysis give better predictions?
机译:包括图论在内的许多数学都是建立在ZFC集合论的基础上的。但是,还有其他基础,选择ZFC可能只是历史上的巧合。特别是,ZFS基础在许多方面都比ZFC基础“更好”或“良好”:它允许完整的Lebesgue测度理论,因此可以在ZFS基础上建立分析和物理学。但另一方面,它消除了诸如Banach-Tarsky悖论之类的异常现象。图表的Shelah-Soifer类别5说明了如果建立在不同的基础上,不同的数学会是多么不同。这引起了许多问题,特别是:1.如果我们尝试继续执行Solovay的项目并在ZFS之上进行分析,该怎么办? 2.此ZFS分析有何不同? 3.从.ZFS分析的角度来看,物理学会给出更好的预测吗?

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号