首页> 外文会议>Society of Plastics Engineers(SPE) Annual Technical Conference; 20070506-11; Cincinnati,OH(US) >WHAT EVERY PLASTICS PROFESSIONAL SHOULD KNOW ABOUT PATENTS AND PATENTING- PART 3: LAWFUL DESIGNING AROUND VALID U.S. PATENTS
【24h】

WHAT EVERY PLASTICS PROFESSIONAL SHOULD KNOW ABOUT PATENTS AND PATENTING- PART 3: LAWFUL DESIGNING AROUND VALID U.S. PATENTS

机译:塑料专业人士应了解的专利和专利知识-第3部分:合法设计有效的美国专利

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Claim elements and construction of claim terms define the intellectual property rights granted in a valid U.S. patent, Markman v. Westview Instruments, Inc., 517 U.S. 370 (1996). As such, based on a claim element-by-element comparison, one may determine whether an accused product or process infringes (literally or under the doctrine of equivalents) a patent claim. Conversely then, carefully designing a product, a process, an apparatus or a chemical composition so that it falls outside the scope of the allowed patent claims would likely avoid potential successful infringement actions. This article provides an overview of literal infringement requirements and the test employed by the courts in determining infringement under the doctrine of equivalents.
机译:索赔要素和索赔条款的结构定义了有效的美国专利Markman诉Westview Instruments,Inc.,517 U.S. 370(1996)中授予的知识产权。因此,根据权利要求的逐项比较,可以确定被指控的产品或过程是否侵犯了专利权利要求(从字面上或在等同原则下)。相反,然后,仔细设计产品,过程,设备或化学成分,使其不超出许可的专利权利要求的范围,可能会避免潜在的成功侵权行为。本文概述了字面上的侵权要求,以及法院根据等同原则确定侵权时所采用的检验标准。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号