首页> 外文会议>Risk analysis XI >POLICY DIFFUSION IN COMMUNITY-SCALE FLOOD RISK MANAGEMENT
【24h】

POLICY DIFFUSION IN COMMUNITY-SCALE FLOOD RISK MANAGEMENT

机译:社区规模洪水风险管理中的政策扩散

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

This study analyzes which communities adopted flood risk management practices during the past 25 years. In particular, we focus on community-scale flood management efforts undertaken voluntarily in towns and counties across the United States. In 1990, the US Federal Emergency Management Agency created the Community Rating System (CRS) to provide incentives to local governments to improve flood resilience. About 1,300 counties and cities voluntarily participate in the CRS, but most eligible communities do not participate. Here, we explore the factors shaping community CRS participation, such as flood risk, socio-economic characteristics, and economic resources, and we assess the competing phenomena of policy diffusion versus free riding. Previous models of community-scale flood mitigation activities have all considered each community's decision as independent of one another. Yet one community's flood management activities might directly or indirectly influence its neighbors' mitigation efforts. Spillover effects or "contagion" may arise if neighboring communities learn from or seek to emulate or outcompete early adopting neighbors. Conversely, stricter regulation in one community may allow its neighbors to capitalize on looser regulation either by attracting more development or enjoying reduced "downstream" flood risks. This paper presents a conceptual model that allows for multiple forces affecting diffusion, such as copycatting and learning from neighboring communities, free-riding on neighbors' efforts, and competing with neighbors to provide valuable amenities. We empirically test for these alternative diffusion pathways after controlling for the spatially correlated extant flood risks, building patterns, and demographics. The analysis integrates several large datasets to predict community flood risk management for all cities and counties in the US since 1990. Controls for local flood risk combined with a spatial lag regression model allow separate identification of alternative diffusion pathways. The results indicate strong evidence of copycatting and also suggest possible free-riding.
机译:本研究分析了过去25年中哪些社区采用了洪水风险管理实践。特别是,我们专注于在美国各地的城镇中自愿开展的社区规模的洪水管理工作。 1990年,美国联邦紧急事务管理局创建了社区评估系统(CRS),以激励地方政府提高抗洪能力。大约1,300个县市自愿参加了CRS,但是大多数合格的社区都不参加。在这里,我们探讨了影响社区CRS参与的因素,例如洪水风险,社会经济特征和经济资源,并评估了政策扩散与搭便车的竞争现象。先前的社区规模的减灾活动模型都将每个社区的决策都视为彼此独立。然而,一个社区的洪水管理活动可能直接或间接影响其邻居的减灾努力。如果邻近社区向早期采纳的邻居学习或试图模仿或胜过其早期采用的邻居,则可能会产生溢出效应或“传染”。相反,一个社区中更严格的法规可能会吸引更多的开发者或减少其“下游”洪水风险,从而使其邻居能够利用宽松的法规。本文提出了一个概念模型,该模型允许影响扩散的多种力量,例如模仿和向邻近社区学习,搭便车,努力与邻居竞争以及与邻居竞争以提供有价值的便利。我们在控制了与空间相关的现存洪水风险,建筑模式和人口统计特征之后,对这些替代扩散途径进行了经验测试。该分析整合了多个大型数据集,以预测自1990年以来美国所有城市和县的社区洪水风险管理。对局部洪水风险的控制与空间滞后回归模型相结合,可以分别识别替代扩散途径。结果表明有很强的模仿力,也暗示了可能的搭便车行为。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号