首页> 外文会议>Recent researches in applied computers and computational science >Automatic Creation of Countermeasure Plan against Process Delay: Creation of Countermeasures based on Crashing and Fast-tracking
【24h】

Automatic Creation of Countermeasure Plan against Process Delay: Creation of Countermeasures based on Crashing and Fast-tracking

机译:自动创建针对流程延迟的对策计划:基于崩溃和快速跟踪的对策创建

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Success or failure of a software project mainly depends on the management capability of the project manager. Therefore, EVA (Earned Value Analysis) is gaining much attention recently as a method of managing a project in an integrated fashion by introducing a unified metric called EV (Earned Value) and quantitatively measuring and analyzing the cost and schedule of a project. Project managers can use EVA to estimate SEAC (Schedule Estimate At Completion) and EAC (Estimate At Completion). However, since EVA does not include constraints as a factor for assigning human resources, such as the available periods of each person, etc., EVA quite often generates inaccurate estimations for SEAC and EAC. In addition, suppose that a situation arises due to a delay in project progress, in which the deadline cannot be met if the project proceeds as is with no countermeasures adopted. In this case, it is necessary to provide a prospect that indicates whether the project can be completed within the original delivery deadline (i.e., the original delivery deadline can be met) or not if any countermeasures are adopted to recover the process delay. If there is some way to bring the project back to its original schedule and complete it within the assigned time table, it is necessary to be able to present the countermeasure or an actual development plan. However, EVA cannot be used to show such a prospect or present the means to restore the project to its original timeline even if such countermeasures exist. This paper proposes a method to solve these problems and discusses its effectiveness by comparing the authors' approach with that of the EVA.
机译:软件项目的成功或失败主要取决于项目经理的管理能力。因此,最近,作为一种以集成方式管理项目的方法,EVA(Earned Value Analysis)受到了广泛关注,该方法通过引入称为EV(Earned Value)的统一指标并定量测量和分析项目的成本和进度来进行。项目经理可以使用EVA来估算SEAC(完成时进度估算)和EAC(完成时进度估算)。但是,由于EVA不包括约束条件作为分配人力资源(例如每个人的可用时间等)的因素,因此EVA通常会针对SEAC和EAC生成不准确的估计。另外,假设由于项目进度的延迟而导致出现这样的情况:如果没有采取任何对策,按原样进行项目,则无法在最后期限之前完成。在这种情况下,如果采取任何对策来恢复流程延迟,则必须提供一个前景,该前景指示该项目是否可以在原始交付期限内完成(即可以满足原始交付期限)。如果有某种方法可以使项目恢复到原来的进度并在指定的时间表内完成,则必须能够提出对策或实际的开发计划。但是,即使存在这种对策,也不能使用EVA来展示这种前景或提出将项目恢复到其原始时间表的方法。本文提出了一种解决这些问题的方法,并通过将作者的方法与EVA的方法进行比较来讨论其有效性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号