首页> 外文会议>PSE ASIA 2007: Program amp; Abstracts >COMPARATIVE STUDY ON OPERATION AND CONTROL OF FOUR BATCH DISTILLATION CONFIGURATIONS WITH VARIOUS OPERATING STRATEGIES
【24h】

COMPARATIVE STUDY ON OPERATION AND CONTROL OF FOUR BATCH DISTILLATION CONFIGURATIONS WITH VARIOUS OPERATING STRATEGIES

机译:多种操作策略的四个批处理蒸馏配置的操作和控制的比较研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Over the past twenty years, quite a few batch distillation configurations and operating strategies have been proposed in open literature. However, there is little published paper discussing on the pros and cons of each configuration with some benchmark examples. In this work, operation and control of four batch distillation configurations with various operating strategies to separate mixtures containing no azeotrope are compared. The batch distillation column figurations considered in this paper include: regular batch distillation column (or called batch rectifier), inverted column (or called batch stripper), batch distillation combining the above two operations (or called middle vessel column), and multi-vessel batch distillation. Three different operating strategies are considered in the paper include: fixed reflux/reboil ratio strategy, variable reflux/reboil ratio strategy, and total reflux strategy. Physically realistic two-, three-, and four-component mixtures will be used in the comparative study. Rigorous dynamic simulation of each batch distillation configuration will be established using Aspen DynamicsTM process simulator. In the comparison, no on-line composition analyzer is assumed to be used in the batch operation, thus product quality will be inferred by some temperature measurements. Capacity factor (CAP) introduced by Luyben[1] or the total batch time (Tbatch) will be used for the comparison of various batch distillation configurations.
机译:在过去的二十年中,公开文献中已经提出了许多分批蒸馏配置和操作策略。但是,很少有发表的论文通过一些基准示例来讨论每种配置的优缺点。在这项工作中,比较了采用不同操作策略分离不含恒沸混合物的四种分批蒸馏配置的操作和控制。本文所考虑的间歇蒸馏塔构型包括:常规间歇蒸馏塔(或称为间歇精馏塔),倒置塔(或称为间歇汽提塔),结合上述两种操作的间歇蒸馏(或称为中间容器塔)和多容器分批蒸馏。本文考虑了三种不同的操作策略:固定回流/再沸比策略,可变回流/再沸比策略和总回流策略。在比较研究中将使用物理上现实的二,三和四组分混合物。使用Aspen DynamicsTM过程模拟器将建立每个批蒸馏配置的严格动态模拟。在比较中,假定在批处理操作中未使用任何在线成分分析仪,因此可以通过一些温度测量来推断产品质量。 Luyben [1]引入的容量因子(CAP)或总分批时间(Tbatch)将用于比较各种分批蒸馏配置。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号