首页> 外文会议>Proceedings of the thirty-second annual meeting of the Western Decision Sciences Institute >MARKET VALUES, EARNINGS AND DIVIDENDS: DIFFERENCES BETWEEN FIRMS PAYING DIVIDENDS AND FIRMS NOT PAYING DIVIDENDS
【24h】

MARKET VALUES, EARNINGS AND DIVIDENDS: DIFFERENCES BETWEEN FIRMS PAYING DIVIDENDS AND FIRMS NOT PAYING DIVIDENDS

机译:市场价值,收益和股息:公司支付股息与未支付股息的公司之间的差异

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

This paper examines the valuation links affecting common stock prices and earnings or dividends. On a rnbasis relative to book value, companies paying dividends show lower earnings, lower current ratios, and rnlower total assets to liabilities ratios than companies paying no dividends. The average market prices of rncompanies paying dividends are lower than those of companies paying no dividends. At this stage, the rnevidence seems to indicate that paying dividends has a negative effect on market prices. However, rnexamining only firms paying dividends after controlling for income, we find that the higher the dividend rnpayout is relative to book value, the higher the share price is relative to book value. The evidence seems rnto indicate that paying dividends has a positive effect on market prices. rnCurrent literature assumes that current common stock market values represent the present value of future rncash flows and, also assume, that dividends signal future earnings or cash flows. However, this would rnbe significant only when there is a strong positive relationship between current dividends and future rnearnings. For example, Easton[2] examined the valuation link of current dividends and current earnings rnwith more sophisticated statistical tools. Their approach utilized two-step regressions: the first step, rnmeasured the present value of future dividends on the security market price; the second step, measured rnthe estimated present value of future dividends predicted by the first model on current earnings and rndividends. They reported that, in general, higher current dividends imply higher stock prices but, for a rngiven level of accounting earnings, higher current dividends imply lower stock prices instead of higher rnstock prices. This seemingly contradiction might arise from running linear regressions while the real rnrelationships are not linear. Other studies, Cheng, Hopwood, and McKeown[1] and Zhang[3] reported rnempirical results of non-linear relationships between stock returns and earnings. Like many of the rnprevious studies, we examine the valuation link of stock prices and earnings or dividends. However, rnunlike most prior studies that examine the information content of dividends and earnings on stock prices rnassuming a present value relationship, we test directly the present value relationship between dividends rnand stock prices.
机译:本文研究了影响普通股价格和收益或股利的估值链接。从相对于账面价值的基础上看,与不支付股息的公司相比,支付股息的公司显示出较低的收益,较低的流动比率以及较低的总资产负债率。支付股息的小型公司的平均市场价格低于不支付股息的公司的平均市场价格。在现阶段,没有证据表明支付股息对市场价格有负面影响。但是,仅检查收入控制后才支付股息的公司,我们发现股息rn相对于账面价值越高,股价相对于账面价值越高。似乎没有证据表明派息对市场价格有积极影响。当前的文献假设当前的普通股市场价值代表未来现金流量的现值,并且还假设股息表示未来的收益或现金流量。但是,只有当当前股息与未来收益之间存在牢固的正相关关系时,这才有意义。例如,Easton [2]使用更复杂的统计工具检查了当前股息和当前收益的估值链接。他们的方法采用了两步回归法:第一步,以证券市场价格衡量未来股息的现值;第二步,测量第一个模型根据当前收益和股息预测的未来股息的估计现值。他们报告说,通常来说,较高的当前股息意味着更高的股价,但是,就给定的会计收益水平而言,较高的当前股息意味着更低的股价而不是较高的股价。这种看似矛盾可能是由于运行线性回归而实际的非线性关系不是线性的。 Cheng,Hopwood和McKeown [1]和Zhang [3]等其他研究报告了股票收益与收益之间非线性关系的实证结果。像许多以前的研究一样,我们研究股价与收益或股息的估值联系。但是,与大多数检查股利和股票收益的信息含量并假设其具有现值关系的先前研究不同,我们直接测试股利与股票价格之间的现值关系。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号