首页> 外文会议>Proceedings of the ASME power conference 2009 >DETERMINATION OF FUEL INPUT FOR A COAL FIRED PLANT PERFORMANCE TEST
【24h】

DETERMINATION OF FUEL INPUT FOR A COAL FIRED PLANT PERFORMANCE TEST

机译:燃煤电厂性能试验燃料输入的测定

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

In applying ASME PTC 46 "Overall Plant Performance" to a coal-fired steam plant, it is mandated that the heat input to the plant is determined by the product of heat input to the steam and the inverse of the steam generator fuel efficiency. Steam generator fuel efficiency is to be determined, per PTC 46, by the energy balance method as detailed in ASME PTC 4 "Fired Steam Generators".rnASME PTC 4 (1998) superseded an earlier Code, ASME PTC 4.1, which is no longer an ANSI standard or an ASME Code (as this paper was being written, PTC 4- 2008 has been published as a revision of PTC 4-1998). PTC 4.1 made use of a simplified "short form" to determine efficiency by what was known as the heat loss method, used by the industry for many years due to its ease of use. The energy balance method is fundamentally different from the heat loss method even in terms of the definition of efficiency and heat input. This paper explores the major differences between the two PTC's (the defunct PTC 4.1 and PTC 4). Without knowing these differences, a direct comparison of PTC 4 and PTC 4.1 results is meaningless and could lead to false conclusions.
机译:在将ASME PTC 46“工厂总体性能”应用于燃煤蒸汽工厂时,要求输入到工厂的热量取决于输入到蒸汽的热量与蒸汽发生器燃料效率的倒数之积。根据PTC 46,将通过能量平衡方法确定蒸汽发生器的燃油效率,具体方法请参见ASME PTC 4“火力蒸汽发生器”。rnASMEPTC 4(1998)取代了以前的ASME PTC 4.1规范, ANSI标准或ASME编码(撰写本文时,PTC 4-2008已作为PTC 4-1998的修订版发布)。 PTC 4.1使用简化的“简写形式”通过所谓的热损失法来确定效率,由于其易用性,业界已使用了很多年。即使在效率和热量输入的定义方面,能量平衡方法也与热损失方法根本不同。本文探讨了两个PTC(已淘汰的PTC 4.1和PTC 4)之间的主要区别。在不了解这些差异的情况下,直接比较PTC 4和PTC 4.1的结果是没有意义的,并且可能导致错误的结论。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号