首页> 外文会议>Human Factors and Ergonomics Society international annual meeting;Human Factors and Ergonomics Society >Effects of active versus static standing on short-duration computer task performance, postural risks, perceived pain, comfort and fatigue.
【24h】

Effects of active versus static standing on short-duration computer task performance, postural risks, perceived pain, comfort and fatigue.

机译:主动与静态站立对短期计算机任务性能,姿势风险,感知的疼痛,舒适性和疲劳的影响。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

This study evaluated the effects of active versus static standing on short-duration computer task performance, postural risks and perceived pain, comfort and fatigue. A repeated measures, within-subjects study was conducted in which 16 participants performed 40 trials of a computer-based homing task in two active standing versus a static standing condition. Computer task performance was operationalized using mousing and typing speed as the measures; postural risk was evaluated using the Rapid Entire Body Assessment (REBA). Perceived scores for pain, comfort and fatigue were reported through a survey administered at baseline and after each standing task condition. Results suggest that for short-duration computer tasks, there was no significant difference in typing speed between active and static standing. However, mousing speed was significantly higher in static standing compared to a specific active standing condition. Overall levels of perceived pain, comfort and fatigue did not differ significantly between active and static standing.
机译:这项研究评估了主动站立与静止站立对短期计算机任务性能,姿势风险以及感觉到的疼痛,舒适性和疲劳的影响。进行了一项重复测量,主题内研究,其中16名参与者在两种主动站立与静态站立条件下进行了40次基于计算机的归位任务试验。使用鼠标移动和打字速度作为衡量指标来实现计算机任务性能;使用快速全身评估(REBA)评估姿势风险。通过基线和每次站立任务后进行的一项调查,报告了疼痛,舒适度和疲劳感的得分。结果表明,对于短期计算机任务,主动站立和静态站立之间的打字速度没有显着差异。但是,与特定的主动站立条件相比,静态站立时的鼠标速度明显更高。主动和静态站立之间的感觉疼痛,舒适感和疲劳的总体水平没有显着差异。

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号