首页> 外文会议>Proceedings of the 4th international symposium on fire investigation science and technology >ADVANCED METHODS FOR DETERMINING THE ORIGIN OF VAPOR CLOUD EXPLOSIONS CASE STUDY:2006 DANVERS EXPLOSION INVESTIGATION
【24h】

ADVANCED METHODS FOR DETERMINING THE ORIGIN OF VAPOR CLOUD EXPLOSIONS CASE STUDY:2006 DANVERS EXPLOSION INVESTIGATION

机译:确定蒸气云爆炸起源的先进方法案例研究:2006年进行爆炸爆炸调查

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

At approximately 2:46 AM on November 22, 2006, the largest explosion in the history of Massachusetts occurred in Danvers in an ink and paint manufacturing facility. The explosion was caused by an accumulation of gas or vapors within the facility that was subsequently ignited. The blast completely destroyed the 1,400 m~2 (15,000 ft~2) facility and caused significant damage to the surrounding property and structures. Broken windows were observed up to 1.6 km (one mile) from the facility. In addition, residences immediately to the north and commercial structures to the west were severely damaged by the blast. The ensuing fire burned in the facility for hours after the explosion. Some key observations regarding the near-field blast damage include: (1) the walls of a production room were observed to have been blown outward during the explosion and must have been due to a significant overpressure early in the explosion, (2) directional damage within the facility that included lifted and bent mezzanine grating, and (3) damage to the neighboring structures outside the facility. Using the advanced dispersion and explosion CFD software FLACS, it was possible to investigate the chain of events leading to the explosion. This included evaluating potential ignition sources within the facility and the corresponding explosion itself, by comparing the simulated overpressures of the exploding fuel-air cloud with the near-field blast damage within and outside the facility. Simulations demonstrated that the Danvers explosion was far from trivial to understand and that the resulting blast-damage was very dependent on the details of the exploding fuel-air mixture. This study showed how only certain ignition locations within the facility storage room were capable of reconciling the observed near-field blast damage, and hence the origin of the explosion was identified. The study further demonstrates how advanced CFD tools such as FLACS provide invaluable analyses for explosion investigations.
机译:2006年11月22日凌晨2:46,马萨诸塞州历史上最大的爆炸发生在丹佛斯的一家油墨和油漆生产厂。爆炸是由设施内气体或蒸气的积累引起的,随后被点燃。爆炸完全摧毁了1,400 m〜2(15,000 ft〜2)的设施,并严重破坏了周围的财产和结构。在距该设施最远1.6公里(一英里)处观察到窗户破裂。此外,爆炸直接破坏了北边的住宅和西边的商业建筑。爆炸后数小时,随后发生的火灾在设施中燃烧。有关近场爆炸破坏的一些关键观察结果包括:(1)观察到生产室的墙壁在爆炸过程中被向外吹,并且一定是由于爆炸初期的显着过压所致;(2)定向破坏设施内的设施包括抬起和弯曲的夹层格栅,以及(3)对设施外部相邻建筑物的损坏。使用先进的扩散和爆炸CFD软件FLACS,可以研究导致爆炸的事件链。这包括通过将爆炸的燃料-空气云的模拟过压与设施内部和外部的近场爆炸损害进行比较,评估设施内部的潜在点火源和相应的爆炸本身。模拟表明,丹佛斯爆炸远非易事,而爆炸伤害很大程度上取决于爆炸的燃料-空气混合物的细节。这项研究表明,在设施储藏室中只有某些点火位置才能够调和观测到的近场爆炸伤害,从而确定了爆炸的起因。该研究进一步证明了先进的CFD工具(例如FLACS)如何为爆炸调查提供宝贵的分析结果。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号