首页> 外文会议>Proceedings of the 2011 ACM/IEEE on joint conference on digital libraries. >Comparative Evaluation of Text- and Citation-based Plagiarism Detection Approaches using GuttenPlag
【24h】

Comparative Evaluation of Text- and Citation-based Plagiarism Detection Approaches using GuttenPlag

机译:使用GuttenPlag对基于文本和引文的gi窃检测方法进行比较评估

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Various approaches for plagiarism detection exist. All are based on more or less sophisticated text analysis methods such as string matching, fingerprinting or style comparison. In this paper a new approach called Citation-based Plagiarism Detection is evaluated using a doctoral thesis [8], in which a volunteer crowd-sourcing project called GuttenPlag [1] identified substantial amounts of plagiarism through careful manual inspection. This new approach is able to identify similar and plagiarized documents based on the citations used in the text. It is shown that citation-based plagiarism detection performs significantly better than text-based procedures in identifying strong paraphrasing, translation and some idea plagiarism. Detection rates can be improved by combining citation-based with text-based plagiarism detection.
机译:存在各种for窃检测方法。所有这些都基于或多或少复杂的文本分析方法,例如字符串匹配,指纹识别或样式比较。在本文中,使用博士论文评估了一种称为“基于引文的Pla窃检测”的新方法,其中一项名为GuttenPlag [1]的志愿者众包项目通过仔细的手动检查发现了大量的窃。这种新方法能够根据文本中使用的引用来识别相似且抄袭的文档。结果表明,在识别强烈的措词,翻译和某些思想窃方面,基于引文的窃检测的性能明显优于基于文本的程序。通过将基于引用的引用与基于文本的窃检测相结合,可以提高检测率。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号