【24h】

You can touch, but you can't look

机译:您可以触摸,但看不到

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Car drivers are nowadays offered a wide array of in-vehicle systems i.e. route guidance systems, climate controls, music players. Such in-vehicle systems often require the driver's visual attention, but visual workload has shown significant less eyes-on-the-road time and affects driving performance. In this paper, we illustrate and compare three different interaction techniques for in-vehicle systems. We refer to them as tactile, touch, and gesture interaction. The focus of the techniques is the effects on drivers while driving cars. We evaluated the interaction techniques with 16 subjects in two settings. Our results showed that gesture interaction has a significant effect on the number of driver eye glances especially eye fixations of more seconds. However, gesture interaction still required rapid eye glances for hand/eye coordination. On the other hand, touch interaction leads to fast and efficient task completion while tactile interaction seemed inferior to the two other interaction techniques.
机译:如今,为汽车驾驶员提供了多种车载系统,即路线引导系统,气候控制,音乐播放器。这样的车载系统通常需要驾驶员的视觉注意,但是视觉工作量显示出大大减少了上路时间,并影响了驾驶性能。在本文中,我们说明并比较了车载系统的三种不同的交互技术。我们将它们称为触觉,触摸和手势交互。该技术的重点是驾驶汽车时对驾驶员的影响。我们在两种情况下评估了与16名受试者的互动技术。我们的结果表明,手势交互对驾驶员眼睛扫视次数(尤其是更长的眼睛注视)有重要影响。然而,手势交互仍然需要快速的眼睛扫视以实现手/眼协调。另一方面,触摸交互导致快速有效的任务完成,而触觉交互似乎不如其他两种交互技术。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号