首页> 外文会议>Petroleum hydrocarbons and organic chemicals in ground water: Prevention, assessment and remediation conference 2007 >A Forensic Approach for Discerning Hydrocarbon Sources during Vapor Intrusion Pathway Investigations
【24h】

A Forensic Approach for Discerning Hydrocarbon Sources during Vapor Intrusion Pathway Investigations

机译:蒸气侵入途径调查中识别烃源的法医方法

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Determining the sources of hydrocarbons in soil gas and indoor and ambient air is an issue at many vapor intrusion sites. Vapor and air samples collected for chemical characterization at vapor intrusion sites are typically analyzed following EPA Method TO-15. The BTEX (benzene, toluene, ethylbenzene and xylenes) compounds, among the few petroleum- or tar-derived hydrocarbons included as target analytes in the standard TO-15 method, are commonly used by investigators to determine if hydrocarbons are present in subsurface soils, and to infer the source(s) of such hydrocarbons. Unfortunately, using only BTEX chemicals for identifying specific hydrocarbon sources in soil gas is problematic because BTEX is present in virtually every type of hydrocarbon product commonly encountered in the subsurface.rnOwners of former MGP sites, gasoline stations and refineries are particularly vulnerable to mistaken liability assignments, because the vapor phase of these petroleum and MGP residues are easily confused with background sources. Conventional analytical techniques (e.g. EPA TO-15) for soil gas and indoor air analysis include a limited number of hydrocarbons with little or no ability to differentiate petroleum and MGP residues from background influences. Although these methods are applicable for quantitative assessments to very low risk levels, these methods were primarily designed for chlorinated solvent analyses. They lack the analyte list and sensitivity for accurate hydrocarbon source identification.rnIn order to accurately characterize the nature and type or types of hydrocarbons sources in soil gas, indoor and ambient air, these environmental samples must be analyzed using a descriptive method of analysis that employs a more robust target analyte list. This paper presents a forensic air method (Forensic TO-15) specifically developed to differentiate tar, gasoline, and background sources during VI investigations. The robust target analyte list includes many Paraffin, Isoparaffin, Aromatic, Naphthene, and Olefin (PIANO) compounds. Forensic TO-15 can be a critical tool for site characterization by producing distinct fingerprints for source determination. The importance and advantages of being able to fingerprint hydrocarbons in the subsurface and indoor air will be discussed and case study data will be presented.
机译:在许多蒸汽入侵现场,确定土壤气体以及室内和环境空气中碳氢化合物的来源是一个问题。通常按照EPA方法TO-15对在蒸汽入侵现场收集的用于化学表征的蒸汽和空气样品进行分析。在标准TO-15方法中,BTEX(苯,甲苯,乙苯和二甲苯)化合物是作为目标分析物包括的少量石油或焦油衍生的烃,研究人员通常使用它们来确定地下土壤中是否存在烃,并推断出这类烃的来源。不幸的是,仅使用BTEX化学品来识别土壤气体中的特定碳氢化合物是有问题的,因为在地下通常遇到的几乎每种类型的碳氢化合物中都存在BTEX。 ,因为这些石油和MGP残留物的气相很容易与背景源混淆。用于土壤气体和室内空气分析的常规分析技术(例如EPA TO-15)包括数量有限的碳氢化合物,几乎没有或没有能力将石油和MGP残留物与背景影响区分开。尽管这些方法适用于风险极低的定量评估,但这些方法主要设计用于氯化溶剂分析。它们缺乏分析物列表和灵敏度,无法准确识别烃源.rn为了准确表征土壤气体,室内和环境空气中烃源的性质和类型,必须使用描述性分析方法对这些环境样品进行分析。更强大的目标分析物列表。本文介绍了一种专门用于在VI调查过程中区分焦油,汽油和背景源的法医空气方法(法医TO-15)。强大的目标分析物列表包括许多石蜡,异链烷烃,芳烃,环烷烃和烯烃(PIANO)化合物。法医TO-15可以通过产生用于来源确定的独特指纹来进行站点表征,这是至关重要的工具。将讨论能够识别地下和室内空气中的碳氢化合物的重要性和优势,并提供案例研究数据。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号