首页> 外文会议>NATO Advanced Research Workshop on Modality, Probability, and Bell's Theorems Aug 19-23, 2001 Cracow, Poland >BELL, BOHM, AND VON NEUMANN: SOME PHILOSOPHICAL INEQUALITIES CONCERNING NO-GO THEOREMS AND THE AXIOMATIC METHOD
【24h】

BELL, BOHM, AND VON NEUMANN: SOME PHILOSOPHICAL INEQUALITIES CONCERNING NO-GO THEOREMS AND THE AXIOMATIC METHOD

机译:贝尔,博姆和冯·纽曼:关于No-Go定理和公理化方法的一些哲学不等式

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

The present paper investigates the philosophical relationship between John von Neumann's No-hidden-variable theorem and Bell's inequalities. Bell erroneously takes the axiomatic method as implying a finality claim and thus ignores von Neumann's strongly pragmatist stance towards mathematical physics. If one considers, however, Hilbert's axiomatic method as a critical enterprise, Bell's theorem improves von Neumann's by defining a more appropriate notion of 'hidden variable' that permits one to include Bohm's interpretation which recovers the predictive content of quantum mechanics. Contrary to Bell's belief, accepting this model does not require adopting the metaphysically realist Bohm picture. If one takes the latter as a physical research programme one sees that it only partly disputes a common domain of facts with the mathematically oriented research programme of von Neumann.
机译:本文研究了约翰·冯·诺伊曼的无隐变量定理与贝尔不等式之间的哲学关系。贝尔错误地将公理化方法暗示为终局主张,因此无视冯·诺依曼对数学物理学的强烈实用主义立场。但是,如果有人认为希尔伯特的公理方法是一项至关重要的工作,则贝尔定理通过定义更合适的“隐变量”概念来改进冯·诺依曼定理,该概念允许人们包括玻姆的解释,以恢复量子力学的预测内容。与Bell的看法相反,接受此模型不需要采用形而上的现实主义的Bohm图。如果有人将后者作为一项物理研究程序,就会看到它只与冯·诺依曼的面向数学的研究程序部分地驳斥了一个共同的事实领域。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号