首页> 外文会议>Metropolis amp; beyond >Comparison of Incremental Dynamic, Cloud, and Stripe Methods for ComputingProbabilistic Seismic Demand Models
【24h】

Comparison of Incremental Dynamic, Cloud, and Stripe Methods for ComputingProbabilistic Seismic Demand Models

机译:计算概率地震需求模型的增量动态,云和条带方法的比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Probabilistic seismic demand models (PSDMs) are mathematical relationsrnbetween measures of earthquake intensity and measures of structural response. Thernmodels include best estimates as well as considerations of uncertainty. Threernmethods for obtaining the demand models are compared in this paper: cloud,rnincremental dynamic, and stripe. A PSDM is derived using each method for a samplernreinforced concrete bridge using a single IM (first-mode spectral acceleration) andrnEDP (column drift ratio). Merits and drawbacks of each method are discussed. Forrnthe structure considered, cloud and incremental dynamic analyses yieldrninterchangeable PSDMs for the same amount of computational effort. Stripe analysisrnshould be used only for individual intensity levels, not as a means of generatingrncomplete PSDMs.
机译:概率地震需求模型(PSDMs)是地震烈度测度和结构响应测度之间的数学关系。模型包括最佳估计以及不确定性因素。本文比较了获取需求模型的三种方法:云,增量动态和条带化。对于每种使用单个IM(第一模式谱加速度)和EDP(列漂移率)的钢筋混凝土桥,使用每种方法得出PSDM。讨论了每种方法的优缺点。对于所考虑的结构,云和增量动态分析可以在相同的计算量下产生可互换的PSDM。条带分析仅应用于单个强度级别,而不能用作生成完整PSDM的方法。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Metropolis amp; beyond》|2005年|1-11|共11页
  • 会议地点 New York NY(US)
  • 作者

    K.R. Mackie; B. Stojadinovi?;

  • 作者单位

    721 Davis Hall #1710, Department of Civil andrnEnvironmental Engineering, University of California, Berkeley email:rnmackie@ce.berkeley.edu;

    rnDepartment of Civil and Environmental Engineering, 721 DavisrnHall #1710, University of California, Berkeley 94720-1710 PH (510) 643-7035rnFAX (510) 643-8928 email: boza@ce.berkeley.edu;

  • 会议组织
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号