首页> 外文会议>International Conference on Law Reform >Legal Certification of the Restitution of Criminal Sanctions for Trading of Criminal Trafficking Persons, Based on Law of Regulation, Component and Regulation of the Company, Regulation of the Republic of Indonesia 7, 2007
【24h】

Legal Certification of the Restitution of Criminal Sanctions for Trading of Criminal Trafficking Persons, Based on Law of Regulation, Component and Regulation of the Company, Regulation of the Republic of Indonesia 7, 2007

机译:根据《印度尼西亚共和国条例》2007年7月7日《公司条例、组成部分和条例》恢复对非法贩运人口交易的刑事制裁的法律证明

获取原文

摘要

Restitution is submitted by the Public Prosecutor by attaching the required documents for the application for restitution, which then the court judge will consider the application for restitution. The problem in this study is how the legal certainty of imposing criminal sanctions for restitution against perpetrators of trafficking in persons based on Law Number 21 of 2007 concerning Eradication of Trafficking in Persons Crime Government Regulation Number 7 of 2018 concerning Provision of Compensation, Restitution, and Assistance to Witnesses and victim? The research method used is normative juridical using secondary data. The results of the study show that legal certainty regarding the imposition of criminal sanctions for restitution for perpetrators of criminal acts of trafficking has been regulated in Law Number 21 of 2007 concerning Eradication of Trafficking in Persons in Government Regulation Number 7 of 2018 concerning Provision of Compensation, Restitution and Assistance to Witnesses and Victims are carried out with a mechanism for submitting restitution since the victim reports a case he has experienced to the local Republic of Indonesia National Police and is handled by the investigator together with the handling of the crime committed. However, in the application of criminal sanctions for restitution against perpetrators of criminal acts of trafficking in decisions of the Jambi District Court Number 538/Pid.Sus/2014/PN.Jmb, on December 18, 2015 it was incorrect because the Court Judges did not examine the complete application for restitution submitted by the Public Prosecutor before deciding on sanctions for restitution, while the Public Prosecutor also carries out negligence by not attaching documents, so that the decision of the Jambi District Court Number 538/Pid.Sus/2014/PN.Jmb can reduce the legal certainty.
机译:公诉人提交归还申请书所需的文件后,恢复原状,法院法官将考虑赔偿申请。本研究中的问题是,根据2007年第21号法律关于根除人口贩运犯罪的规定,对人口贩运犯罪人实施刑事制裁以恢复原状的法律确定性如何?2018年第7号政府条例关于向证人和被害人提供赔偿、恢复原状和援助的规定?使用的研究方法是规范的司法方法,使用二次数据。研究结果表明,2007年第21号法律《关于根除人口贩运的法律》和2018年第7号政府条例《关于提供赔偿的法律》对实施刑事制裁以恢复贩运犯罪行为人的合法性进行了规定,对证人和被害人的恢复原状和协助是通过一种提交恢复原状的机制进行的,因为被害人向当地印度尼西亚共和国国家警察报告了他所经历的案件,并由调查人员与所犯罪行的处理人员一起处理。然而,在对贩运人口犯罪行为的犯罪人实施恢复原状的刑事制裁时,Jambi地区法院(编号538/Pid)的判决被驳回。Sus/2014/PN。Jmb,2015年12月18日,这是不正确的,因为法院法官在决定恢复原状的制裁之前没有审查检察官提交的完整的恢复原状申请,而检察官也因没有附上文件而犯了过失,因此,贾姆比地区法院第538/Pid号的决定被驳回。Sus/2014/PN。Jmb会降低法律确定性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号