首页> 外文会议>International Conference on Emerging Trends and Advances in Electrical Engineering and Renewable Energy;ETAEERE >Analysis and Prediction of Cardiovascular Disease Using Machine Learning Techniques
【24h】

Analysis and Prediction of Cardiovascular Disease Using Machine Learning Techniques

机译:采用机器学习技术的心血管疾病分析与预测

获取原文

摘要

Cardiovascular disease is the silent killer of human lives in the world. This disease has some common treatments such as meditation and health valve surgery. Prior to the treatment of the disease, we must know the patients have the symptoms or not. In the hospital system, a lot of patient records are available to analyze using machine learning algorithms. Our paper used heart disease patient dataset and six different kinds of supervised machine learning techniques that are k-NN, decision trees (DT), SVM, logistic regression, Naive Bayes (NB), and random forest to compare the accuracy, precision, recall, and f-measure on each classifier by train-test split as well as k-fold cross-validation methods with different ratio and values. Logistic regression model gives the best accuracy of 82% for 80:20 and 75:25 split. SVM also gives an accuracy of 82% for 75:25 split. Similarly, logistic regression model gives an accuracy of 82% for tenfold cross-validation, as the data is evenly distributed. In general, logistic regression and SVM have better accuracy than the other classifiers.
机译:心血管疾病是世界上人类生活的沉默杀手。该疾病具有一些常见的治疗方法,如冥想和健康瓣膜手术。在治疗疾病之前,我们必须知道患者有症状与否。在医院系统中,可以使用机器学习算法分析大量患者记录。我们的纸张用过的心脏病患者数据集和六种不同的监督机器学习技术,是K-NN,决策树(DT),SVM,逻辑回归,天真贝叶斯(NB)和随机森林,比较精度,精度,召回并且通过火车测试分割以及具有不同比率和值的k折叠交叉验证方法的每个分类器上的f测量。 Logistic回归模型为80:20和75:25分开的最佳精度为82%。 SVM还给出了75:25分裂的准确性为82%。同样,逻辑回归模型为十倍交叉验证提供了82%的准确性,因为数据均匀分布。通常,Logistic回归和SVM具有比其他分类器更好的准确性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号