首页> 外文会议>International Conference on Research, Implementation, and Education Mathematics and Science >Analysis of Students' Critical Thinking Skills at Junior High School in Science Learning
【24h】

Analysis of Students' Critical Thinking Skills at Junior High School in Science Learning

机译:科学学习中学高中学生批判性技能分析

获取原文

摘要

Critical thinking skills is one of students' skills needed to face globalization in 21st century challenge. Critical thinking skills are active processes to thinking deeply due to topic or materials through meaningful way. The indicators of critical thinking skills are thinking about certain topic in depth, asking questions, and finding relevant information. This study aimed to analyze students' critical thinking skills at junior high school in science learning. Instruments used in this study were created according to Facione indicators of critical thinking skills namely to interpret, to analyze, to evaluate, to infer, to explain, and to do self-control. Subjects in this study were 256 students of seventh grade at junior high school in Karanganyar. Purposive sampling were used as sampling technique. Results showed that two indicators have gained good category namely to analyze that was 62% and to evaluate that was 70%; while four other indicators have gained sufficient category namely to interpret that was 35%, to infer that was 49%, to explain that was 40%, and to do self-control that was 46%. The conclusion of this study was there were two indicators of students' critical thinking skills gained good category and four indicators of students' critical thinking skills gained sufficient category. Thus proper follow-up of this study is needed to explore ways to improve the achievements of each indicators in students' critical thinking skills.
机译:批判性思维技能是在21世纪挑战中面对全球化所需的学生技能之一。批判性思维技能是通过有意义的方式思考主题或材料的积极过程。批判性思维技能的指标正在考虑深入,提出问题和寻找相关信息的某些主题。本研究旨在分析科学学习中学高中学生的批判性思维技巧。本研究中使用的仪器是根据批判性思维技能的面向指标创建的,即解释,分析,评估,以推断,解释和做自我控制。本研究中的主题是卡朗尼达初中七年级的256名学生。用作采样采样作为采样技术。结果表明,两名指标已获得良好的类别,即分析为62%,评价为70%;虽然四个其他指标已经获得了足够的类别,即解释为35%,以推断为49%,解释为40%,并进行自我控制,为46%。本研究的结论是有两个学生的批判性思维技能指标,获得了良好的类别和四个学生批判性思维技能的指标获得了足够的类别。因此,需要采取这项研究的适当随访,探讨提高学生批判性思维技能的每个指标的成就。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号