首页> 外文会议>International Conference on Advanced Materials for Science and Engineering >Engineering teaching courses leading-in creativity which demands teaching situation and element analysis
【24h】

Engineering teaching courses leading-in creativity which demands teaching situation and element analysis

机译:工程教学课程导致创造力,需要教学情况和元素分析

获取原文

摘要

In the era of industry 4.0, students not only need to cater to the needs of customers but also need to achieve the goal of integrating industrial skills with sales and products experience. It also helps to build up the complete adaptability, efficiency of resource and smart factory of human factors and ergonomics. As the result, there is a huge change of education in the field of engineering. Systematic cultivation of theory of innovation thinking and the practical application would be valued. Thus, this research chose the engineering students from one of the famous universities in Taiwan as the objects of study and also chose three courses of the college as the research samples. This research aimed at qualitative analyzing by doing in-depth interview and class observation to examine the teachers' teaching, students' learning attitudes and the arrangement of courses. According to this research suggests that there are two parts of the characters of teachers' teaching and students' learning of the college of engineering. First, teachers from engineering fields still focus on the outcome of `power of operation', thus, teachers especially emphasize on logics and `elaboration'. Furthermore, they regard students' `internal interests' is the top condition of learning. Second, the characters of the students from the college of engineering put stress on learning knowledge and skill systematically. Brainstorming and skill integration of project are developed in the end. Although the students show the positive attitudes of solving problems, it is hard for them to present the achievements of the course in finite time. As the result, this research suggests the adaptability and supporting measures of leading Three-Capacity to courses to advance the efficiency. In basic engineering courses and experimental courses, students need to learn basic concepts and skill; therefore, teachers have to provide the students with concrete practical teaching materials and proper materials and guide them to observe, thinking, present and lead creative thinking to courses. The advanced courses of engineering belong to be practical learning. To make students get rid of the old way that learning systematically and guide them to think creatively and integrate what they learn, teachers adopt unit-oriented teaching with creativity methods to be one of the characters of guidance of engineering teaching.
机译:在行业时代4.0时,学生不仅需要满足客户的需求,还需要实现将工业技能与销售和产品经验整合的目标。它还有助于建立人类因素和人体工程学的资源和智能工厂的完全适应性,效率。结果,在工程领域存在巨大的教育变化。重视创新思维理论的系统培养和实际应用。因此,这项研究选择了台湾着名大学之一的工程学生作为学习的对象,也选择了学院的三个课程作为研究样本。这项研究旨在通过深入访谈和阶级观察来审查教师教学,学生的学习态度和课程安排的定性分析。据这项研究表明,教师教学与学生学习工程学院有两部分。首先,来自工程领域的教师仍然专注于“操作权力”的结果,因此,教师尤其强调逻辑和“阐述”。此外,他们认为学生的“内部利益”是学习的最重要条件。其次,从工程学院的学生人物系统地强调了学习知识和技能的压力。最终开发了项目的头脑风暴和技能整合。虽然学生表现出解决问题的积极态度,但他们很难在有限时间内展示课程的成就。结果,本研究表明,对课程的主要三能力的适应性和支持措施推进效率。在基础工程课程和实验课程中,学生需要学习基本概念和技能;因此,教师必须为学生提供具体的实用教材和适当的材料,并指导他们观察,思考,现在和引导创造性思维。工程的高级课程属于实际学习。让学生摆脱系统地学习的旧方式,并引导他们创造性地思考并融入他们所学的思考,教师采用了以创造性方法为导向的教学,成为工程教学指导的特征之一。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号