首页> 外文会议>Electric Power and Renewable Energy Conference >A Comparative Analysis of EVs Scheduling Strategies to Accomplish Valley Filling
【24h】

A Comparative Analysis of EVs Scheduling Strategies to Accomplish Valley Filling

机译:EVS调度策略完成谷填充的比较分析

获取原文

摘要

In this work, the impact of four different EV charging strategies, namely MLVM, MLFM, VSCM and MCCM on average demand, peak demand, valley demand, peak-valley difference and load factor on grid demand profile is investigated. Results show that the maximum valley filling is obtained in case of VSCM followed by MLVM. The valley filling for all strategies improvises on increasing the penetration of EVs. Moreover, MCCM results in minimum EV charging cost among all four strategies. In respect to future work, impact of these strategies can be examined on network losses and voltages by incorporating network constraints.
机译:在这项工作中,研究了四种不同EV充电策略,即MLVM,MLFM,VSCM和MCCM平均需求,峰值需求,谷需求,峰谷差异和负载系数的影响,进行了研究。结果表明,在VSCM之后获得最大谷填充物,然后是MLVM。所有策略填写的山谷即兴提高了EVS的渗透。此外,MCCM导致所有四种策略中的最低电压计费。就未来的工作而言,通过纳入网络限制,可以对网络损耗和电压进行影响。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号