首页> 外文会议>SPIE Conference on Computer-Aided Diagnosis >Deep Convolutional Neural Network for Mammographic Density Segmentation
【24h】

Deep Convolutional Neural Network for Mammographic Density Segmentation

机译:乳房X射出密度分割的深卷积神经网络

获取原文

摘要

Breast density is one of the most significant factors for cancer risk. In this study, we proposed a supervised deep learning approach for automated estimation of percentage density (PD) on digital mammography (DM). The deep convolutional neural network (DCNN) was trained to estimate a probability map of breast density (PMD). PD was calculated as the ratio of the dense area to the breast area based on the probability of each pixel belonging to dense region or fatty region at a decision threshold of 0.5. The DCNN estimate was compared to a feature-based statistical learning approach, in which gray level, texture and morphological features were extracted from each ROI and the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) was used to select and combine the useful features to generate the PMD. The reference PD of each image was provided by two experienced MQSA radiologists. With IRB approval, we retrospectively collected 347 DMs from patient files at our institution. The 10-fold cross-validation results showed a strong correlation r=0.96 between the DCNN estimation and interactive segmentation by radiologists while that of the feature-based statistical learning approach vs radiologists' segmentation had a correlation r=0.78. The difference between the segmentation by DCNN and by radiologists was significantly smaller than that between the feature-based learning approach and radiologists (p < 0.0001) by two-tailed paired t-test. This study demonstrated that the DCNN approach has the potential to replace radiologists' interactive thresholding in PD estimation on DMs.
机译:乳房密度是癌症风险最重要的因素之一。在这项研究中,我们提出了一种监督的深度学习方法,用于数字乳房X线照相术(DM)上的自动估计百分比密度(PD)。培训深度卷积神经网络(DCNN)以估计乳房密度(PMD)的概率图。基于在0.5的判定阈值下,基于属于致密区域或脂肪区的每个像素的概率计算PD作为乳腺区域的比率。将DCNN估计与基于特征的统计学习方法进行比较,其中从每个ROI提取灰度,纹理和形态特征,并且使用最小的绝对收缩和选择操作员(套索)来选择并结合生成的有用功能PMD。每个图像的参考PD由两个经历的MQSA放射科学家提供。凭借IRB批准,我们回顾性来自我们机构的患者文件中的347个DMS。 10倍的交叉验证结果显示放射科学家DCNN估计和交互式分割之间的强相关R = 0.96,而基于特征的统计学习方法与放射科学家分割的相关性R = 0.78。 DCNN和放射科学家的分割之间的差异显着小于通过双尾配对T检验的基于特征的学习方法和放射科(P <0.0001)之间的差异。本研究表明,DCNN方法有可能在DMS上替换放射科学家的交互式阈值阈值。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号