首页> 外文会议>European Conference on Noise Control >Comparison of two methods for in-situ measurement of the absorption coefficient
【24h】

Comparison of two methods for in-situ measurement of the absorption coefficient

机译:两种方法对吸收系数的原位测量方法的比较

获取原文

摘要

The Adrienne method is an often used measurement technique developed for outdoor (in-situ) measurements of sound reflection and airborne sound insulation, as standardized in the CEN/TS 1793-5 norm. This norm was used as the basis for the design of two measuring systems for determining the absorption coefficient and sound insulation of noise barriers and built-in roof and wall systems where no laboratory data on the acoustical performance are known. The goal of this paper is to compare both systems using the Adrienne method of in-situ measurement of the absorption coefficient and another method which uses multiplication of the impulse responses with the ratio between estimated time of arrival of the direct and reflected incoming sound impulse, as used in some commercial acoustic measurement applications such as Easera. The used excitation signal was the exponential sine sweep. The measurement results obtained by these two methods were analyzed, processed and the results are compared.
机译:Adrienne方法是一种经常使用的用于室外(原位)测量的测量技术,用于声反射和空气传播隔音,如CEN / TS 1793-5规范中的标准化。该规范被用作设计两个测量系统的基础,用于确定噪声屏障的吸收系数和隔音系统,内置屋顶和墙壁系统,在那里没有关于声学性能的实验室数据。本文的目标是使用Adrienne方法的吸收系数的原位测量和另一种方法比较两个系统,以及使用脉冲响应乘以直接和反射传入声音冲动的估计到达时间之间的比率。如在某些商业声学测量应用中使用,例如Easera。二手激励信号是指数正弦扫描。通过对这两种方法获得的测量结果进行了分析,加工,并比较了结果。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号