【24h】

Discriminant versus Strong Rule Sets

机译:判别与强大的规则集

获取原文

摘要

The main objective of our research was to compare two completely different approaches to rule induction. In the first approach, represented by the LEM2 rule induction algorithm, induced rules are discriminant, i.e., every concept is completely described and rules are consistent. In the second approach, represented by the IRIM rule induction algorithm, a few strong and simple rules are induced. These rules do not necessarily completely describe concepts and, in general, are inconsistent. Though LEM2 frequently outperforms IRIM, the difference in performance is, statistically, insignificant. Thus IRIM, inducing a few strong but simple rules is a new and interesting addition to the LERS data mining system.
机译:我们研究的主要目标是比较两个完全不同的方法来统治诱导。在由LEM2规则感应算法表示的第一种方法中,诱导规则是判别的,即完全描述的每个概念,规则是一致的。在第二种方法中,由IRIM规则感应算法表示,引起了一些强大和简单的规则。这些规则并不一定完全描述概念,一般而言,概念不一致。虽然LEM2经常优于IRIM,但性能差异是统计上的,微不足道。因此,IRIM,诱导少量强大但简单的规则是LERS数据挖掘系统的新的和有趣的补充。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号