【24h】

Generating Fact Checking Briefs

机译:生成事实检查简报

获取原文

摘要

Fact checking at scale is difficult-while the number of active fact checking websites is growing, it remains too small for the needs of the contemporary media ecosystem. However, despite good intentions, contributions from volunteers are often error-prone, and thus in practice restricted to claim detection. We investigate how to increase the accuracy and efficiency of fact checking by providing information about the claim before performing the check, in the form of natural language briefs. We investigate passage-based briefs, containing a relevant passage from Wikipedia, entity-centric ones consisting of Wikipedia pages of mentioned entities, and Question-Answering Briefs, with questions decomposing the claim, and their answers. To produce QABriefs, we develop QABRIEFER, a model that generates a set of questions conditioned on the claim, searches the web for evidence, and generates answers. To train its components, we introduce QABRIEFDATASET which we collected via crowdsourcing. We show that fact checking with briefs - in particular QABriefs - increases the accuracy of crowdworkers by 10% while slightly decreasing the time taken. For volunteer (unpaid) fact checkers, QABriefs slightly increase accuracy and reduce the time required by around 20%.
机译:事实上检查规模很难 - 虽然检查网站的积极事实的数量正在增长,但对于当代媒体生态系统的需求来说仍然太小。然而,尽管良好的意图,志愿者的贡献往往是容易出错的,因此在实践中,仅限于要求侦查。我们调查如何通过在进行检查之前提供有关索赔的信息,以自然语言简报的形式提高事实检查的准确性和效率。我们调查基于段落的简介,其中包含由维基百科,实体为中心的相关段落,由提到实体的维基百科页面组成,以及质疑回答简报,提出索赔及其答案。要生成Qabriefs,我们开发Qabriefer,一种模型,它会在索赔中生成一组问题,搜索Web进行证据,并生成答案。要培训其组件,我们介绍了我们通过众包收集的Qabriefdataset。我们展示了与简介的事实 - 特别是Qabriefs - 将人群的准确性提高了10%,同时略微降低所花费的时间。对于志愿者(未缴款)的事实检查,Qabriefs略微提高准确性,并减少约20%所需的时间。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号