首页> 外文会议>Workshop on Knowledge Extraction and Integration for Deep Learning Architectures >Investigating the Effect of Background Knowledge on Natural Questions
【24h】

Investigating the Effect of Background Knowledge on Natural Questions

机译:调查背景知识对自然问题的影响

获取原文

摘要

Existing work shows the benefits of integrating KBs with textual evidence for QA only on questions that are answerable by KBs alone (Sun et al., 2019). In contrast, real world QA systems often have to deal with questions that might not be directly answerable by KBs. Here, we investigate the effect of integrating background knowledge from KBs for the Natural Questions (NQ) task. We create a subset of the NQ data. Factual Questions (FQ), where the questions have evidence in the KB in the form of paths that link question entities to answer entities but still must be answered using text, to facilitate further research into KB integration methods. We propose and analyze a simple, model-agnostic approach for incorporating KB paths into text-based QA systems and establish a strong upper bound on FQ for our method using an oracle retriever. We show that several variants of Personalized PageRank based fact retrievers lead to a low recall of answer entities and consequently fail to improve QA performance. Our results suggest that fact retrieval is a bottleneck for integrating KBs into real world QA datasets.
机译:现有的研究表明,将知识库与文本证据结合起来,仅在知识库本身可以回答的问题上进行QA的好处(Sun等人,2019年)。相比之下,现实世界的QA系统通常必须处理KBs可能无法直接回答的问题。在这里,我们研究了自然问题(NQ)任务中整合知识库背景知识的效果。我们创建NQ数据的一个子集。事实问题(FQ),其中问题在知识库中以链接问题实体和答案实体的路径的形式存在证据,但仍然必须使用文本进行回答,以促进知识库集成方法的进一步研究。我们提出并分析了一种简单的、模型无关的方法,用于将KB路径合并到基于文本的QA系统中,并为我们使用oracle检索器的方法建立了FQ的强上界。我们发现,基于PageRank的个性化事实检索器的几种变体导致答案实体的召回率较低,因此无法提高QA性能。我们的结果表明,事实检索是将知识库集成到现实世界的质量保证数据集的瓶颈。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号