首页> 外文会议>International Workshop on Multi-Agent-Based Simulation >To Big Wing, or Not to Big Wing, Now an Answer
【24h】

To Big Wing, or Not to Big Wing, Now an Answer

机译:到大翼,或者不是大翼,现在是一个答案

获取原文

摘要

The Churchillian quote "Never, in the field of human conflict, was so much owed by so many to so few" [3], encapsulates perfectly the heroics of Royal Air Force (RAF) Fighter Command (FC) during the Battle of Britain. Despite the undoubted heroics, questions remain about how FC employed the 'so few'. In particular, the question as to whether FC should have employed the 'Big Wing' tactics, as per 12 Group, or implement the smaller wings as per 11 Group, remains a source of much debate. In this paper, I create an agent based model (ABM) simulation of the Battle of Britain, which provides valuable insight into the key components that influenced the loss rates of both sides. It provides mixed support for the tactics employed by 11 Group, as the model identified numerous variables that impacted the success or otherwise of the British.
机译:丘吉尔报价“从来没有,在人类冲突领域,如此多的欠款所欠的”[3],完全封装了英国战役期间皇家空军(RAF)战斗机指挥(FC)的英雄。尽管有了无疑的英雄主义,但仍然存在关于FC如何雇用的“很少”的问题。特别是关于FC是否应该雇用“大翼”战术,按照12组雇用“大翼”策略,或者实施每11个集团的较小翅膀,仍然是争论的源头。在本文中,我创建了英国战役的基于代理的模型(ABM)模拟,这为影响双方损失率的关键组件提供了宝贵的洞察力。它为11组采用的策略提供了混合支持,因为该模型确定了影响英国成功或其他方式的许多变量。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号