首页> 外文会议>International Technology, Education and Development Conference >(1204) “HARMONIZING QUALITY ASSURANCE STRATEGIES IN GEORGIA WITH STANDARDS FOR QUALITY ASSURANCE IN THE EUROPEAN HIGHER EDUCATION AREA (ENQA)'' -DISSEMINATION STRATEGY IN THE FRAMEWORK OF TEMPUS PROJECT
【24h】

(1204) “HARMONIZING QUALITY ASSURANCE STRATEGIES IN GEORGIA WITH STANDARDS FOR QUALITY ASSURANCE IN THE EUROPEAN HIGHER EDUCATION AREA (ENQA)'' -DISSEMINATION STRATEGY IN THE FRAMEWORK OF TEMPUS PROJECT

机译:(1204)“佐治亚州的质量保证战略与欧洲高等教育区(ENQA)的质量保证标准”在腾腾节目框架中的质量保证标准

获取原文

摘要

The article deals with the findings of the gap analysis conducted by the institutions as the result of theworkpackage 2 in the framework of the TEMPUS project TNE_QA (Promoting Quality and Recognitionof Transnational Education in Armenia and Georgia). Synthetic self-evaluation of TEMPUS Projectpartner Universities was provided via gap analysis to harmonize the quality assurance strategies withthe standards and guidelines for quality assurance in the European Higher Education Area (ENQA).At first 7 domains were defined by the questionnaire:1 Policy and procedures for quality assurance;;2 Approval, monitoring and periodic review of programs and awards;;3 Assessment of students;;4 Quality assurance of teaching staff;;5 Learning resources and student support;;6 Information systems;;7 Public information.For each domain, the guidelines of ENQA & OECD/UNESCO were followed and a realistic and honestevaluation of the institution position was provided. The exercise was done from the point of internalquality assurance of HEIs.Gap analysis provided by the institutions showed whether 1. The institution was doing particularly wellregarding the criterion, the procedures existed and the evaluation results were good: no particularchange or improvement was needed;;2. The institution was performing average on the criteria: theprocedures existed and some results were satisfying, but there was still some room for improvement;;3. The institution performed poorly, either because the procedures were not yet operational orbecause the institution struggled to get acceptable results on the criterion;;4. The institution did not atall cover some aspects or all of the aspects of a criterion. The comments showing the reason of theexisting gap helped the institution better understand the concrete situation and present someevidence.The concrete findings helped the HEIs find the strength and weakness of their internal qualityassurance system and define the ways of improvement for implementing TNE.
机译:本文涉及机构在The WorksPackage 2在Tewal Project TNE_QA(促进亚美尼亚和格鲁吉亚跨国教育的质量和认可)的框架中的结果。通过差距分析提供了Tempus ProjectPartner大学的综合自我评估,以协调欧洲高等教育区域(ENQA)质量保证标准和准则的质量保证策略.AT由调查问卷定义的前7个域名:1政策和程序定义适用于质量保证; 2批准,监测和定期审查方案和奖项; 3学生的评估; 4个教学人员的质量保证;; 5学习资源和学生支持;; 6信息系统;必须每个领域,遵循ENQA&OECD / UNESCO的准则,并提供了机构立场的现实和诚实。该练习是从内部正式保证的,由机构提供的秘书处的分析。该机构是否表现出特别是妥善制作,所存在的程序,评价结果良好:不确定或改善;; 2。该机构在标准上表现平均值:现有的存在,一些结果令人满意,但仍有一些改进的空间;; 3。该机构的表现不佳,要么是程序尚未运作,事项尚未运作,因为机构在标准上努力获得可接受的结果;; 4。该机构没有atall涵盖标准的一些方面或所有方面。显示出于外观差距的原因的评论有助于该机构更好地了解具体情况和现在的Someevident。具体的调查结果有助于HEIS找到其内部质量条容系统的实力和弱点,并定义了实施TNE的改进方式。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号