首页> 外文会议>International Conference of the International Association for Management of Technology >WILL UNIFIED CONTROL OF GOVERNMENT LEADS TO GREATER KNOWLEDGE SPILLOVER? -EVIDENCE FROM CHINA
【24h】

WILL UNIFIED CONTROL OF GOVERNMENT LEADS TO GREATER KNOWLEDGE SPILLOVER? -EVIDENCE FROM CHINA

机译:统一控制政府会导致更大的知识溢出吗? - 从中国的可行性

获取原文

摘要

Universities are the creator and transmitter of knowledge and technology, and their R&D activities have positive externalities which could enhance regional innovation by knowledge spillover, thus making it vital to the regional economic development. However, different from the innovation system of developed countries, the universities in China are still under the intensified control of the government, which are regarded as an obstacle to innovation due to their corruption and bureaucracy. Despite increasing attention to the role of government to firms' innovation performance, few studies have explicitly shed light on its impact to universities. Drawing on knowledge spillover theory, this study established a model to examine the moderating effect of the governmental actions to the knowledge spillover effect of the universities, and provided a clear interpretation with empirical evidence to the knowledge spillover mechanism of the universities in China. This study utilized two different proxies to investigate the innovation performance of industrial enterprises by measuring the patent application number (intermediate outcome) and the new product sales volume (end outcome). Based on the improved Cobb-Douglas knowledge production function, the research took the ratio of planned economy as the proxy variable of the intensity of government's control. On the basis of the panel data of 30 provinces in China from 2003 to 2008, we used GLS with fixed effect model to examine whether unified control from the government will enhance or impede the knowledge spillover of universities. This study find that the unified control of government had a positive moderating effect towards the knowledge spillover of universities in terms of both patent application number and new product sales volume of industries, thus in turn leading to greater innovation performance in enterprises. The result is robust using different rate of depreciation of R&D capital. These findings indicated that the unified control of the government enhanced the knowledge spillover of universities and improved the regional innovation performance through scale effect at the early stage of emerging economies. Former researches tended to consider government as an obstacle to innovations, but this study showed an exception to the field that the unified control of government may not hinder innovations at the beginning. At the early stages of emerging economies, innovation capability could be promoted rapidly when resources were pooled by unified control of government. Even so, if developing countries are to become developed countries, they still need to gradually improve their innovation system. At the later period of the development of emerging economies, the regional innovation performance may suffer because of the marginal effect decrease of only focusing on short-term profits. Therefore, the universities are still needed to increase their autonomy to make use of the moderating effect of the market itself, and improve the innovation performance via diversified and open innovation activities.
机译:大学是知识和技术的创作者和发射机,他们的研发活动有积极的外部性,可以通过知识溢出来提高区域创新,从而使区域经济发展至关重要。然而,与发达国家的创新制度不同,中国的大学仍处于加强对政府的控制,这被视为由于腐败和官僚主义而被视为创新的障碍。尽管政府对企业的创新绩效的作用提高了越来越关注,但很少有研究则在对大学的影响下明确阐明。借鉴知识溢出理论,该研究建立了一种模型,以研究政府行动对大学知识溢出效应的调节效果,并为中国大学知识溢出机制提供了明确的解释。本研究采用了两种不同的代理来调查工业企业的创新性能,通过测量专利申请号(中级结果)和新产品销量(最终结果)。基于改进的COBB-DOGGLAS知识生产职能,研究计划经济与政府控制强度的代理变量的比例。根据2003年至2008年中国30个省份的小组数据,我们使用了固定效果模型的GLS来检查政府的统一控制是否会加强或阻碍大学知识溢出。本研究发现,在专利申请号和新产品销量方面,政府统一控制对大学的知识溢出效果积极调节效果,从而导致企业的创新性能更大。结果是使用不同的研发资本折旧速率稳健。这些调查结果表明,政府的统一控制增强了大学的知识溢出,并通过新兴经济体的早期效益改善了区域创新绩效。前研究趋于将政府视为创新的障碍,但这项研究表明,该领域的统一控制可能无法在一开始就妨碍创新。在新兴经济体的早期阶段,当通过统一控制政府控制资源时,可以迅速推广创新能力。即便如此,如果发展中国家成为发达国家,他们仍然需要逐步改善他们的创新体系。在新兴经济体发展的后期,区域创新绩效可能遭受遭受的损失,因为只关注短期利润的边际效应减少。因此,大学仍然需要增加自主权,以利用市场本身的调节效果,并通过多样化和开放的创新活动提高创新绩效。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号