首页> 外文会议>IFIP WG 8.5 International Conference on Electronic Government >Proactivity Postponed? 'Capturing' Records Created in the Context of E-government - A Literary Warrant Analysis of the Plans for a National e-archive Service in Sweden
【24h】

Proactivity Postponed? 'Capturing' Records Created in the Context of E-government - A Literary Warrant Analysis of the Plans for a National e-archive Service in Sweden

机译:Proastiving推迟了? '捕获'在电子政务背景下创建的记录 - 对瑞典国家电子档案服务计划的文学保证分析

获取原文

摘要

Proactive records management is often described as a prerequisite for a well-functioning public administration that is efficient, legally secure and democratic. In the context of e-government, official information is seen as a valuable asset, which is why technical solutions are developed to improve accessibility and reusability. Yet how to 'capture' and preserve the information is still unclear, and adaptations of routines which have originated in a paper based administration to practices suitable for managing digital records are often lacking. This risks impeding on the work of public agencies, their services toward citizens, and the goals of e-government. This paper uses current plans for developing a national e-archive service in Sweden as a case, applying literary warrant and the records continuum model to discuss how archives management can support the goals of e-government and facilitate proactivity. A special focus is placed on 'capture' as a vital part of holistic recordkeeping. The result shows that despite regulations and ambitions supporting proactivity, 'capture' is not emphasized as a necessity for using, sharing and preserving official information. This could create archives that are incomplete, and risk contributing to a decline in governmental transparency and openness.
机译:主动记录管理通常被描述为具有高效,合法安全和民主的运作良好的公共行政的先决条件。在电子政务的背景下,官方信息被视为宝贵的资产,这就是为什么开发技术解决方案以提高可访问性和可重用性的原因。然而,如何“捕获”并保留信息仍然不明确,并且往往缺乏对适用于管理数字记录的纸张的实践进行的常规的适应。这种风险阻碍了公共机构的工作,他们对公民的服务以及电子政务的目标。本文采用现有计划在瑞典开发国家电子档案服务,以案例为例,应用文学保证和记录连续体型讨论档案管理如何支持电子政务的目标,促进课程。特别重点是“捕获”作为整体记录保存的重要组成部分。结果表明,尽管支撑了支持的规定和野心,但“捕获”并不强调为使用,共享和保留官方信息的必要性。这可能会产生不完整的档案,并且有助于政府透明度和开放性下降。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号