首页> 外文会议>International Rapeseed Congress >Oilseed rape mechanical weed control as an alternative or a complement to chemical weed control
【24h】

Oilseed rape mechanical weed control as an alternative or a complement to chemical weed control

机译:石油油菜机械杂草控制作为化学杂草控制的替代品或补充

获取原文

摘要

For agronomic, economic and environmental reasons, weed control in farming systems can no longer only rely on selective herbicides. In this context, mechanical weed control can be an alternative or a complement to herbicides. Trying to reduce the production costs and solving weeding problems that herbicides cannot solve are the two main reasons that lead farmers to adopt these techniques, but they also express fears about the high sensitivity to the climate and the work time these techniques require. Three tools have been tested in a network of 15 farmers' fields since 2003, alone or combined with herbicides: the in-row hoe, the finger weeder and the rotary hoe, in different types of soils and on different weeds. The selectivity has been assessed for each tool:the in-row hoe can be used from stage 3 leaves of the oilseed rape until the moment when the oilseed rape covers the inter-row;the finger weeder at pre-emergence stage and then from stage 3 leaves; the rotary hoe from pre-emergence to stage 4-5 leaves,including cotyledon stage. The efficacy of the finger weeder and the rotary hoe are very dependant on the development stage of the weeds: it strongly decreases when the weeds have more than 3 leaves. Efficacy rates of 80% and more have been reached in the trials in optimal conditions (weeds stage, soils, climate, etc...). Mechanical weed control is efficient against weeds that are hard to destroy with herbicides (crucifer weeds for example). One technique consists in spraying herbicides only on the row when sowing, and then using the in-row hoe to destroy weeds between the rows. The quantity of herbicides is thus reduced by 60% since only a part of the surface is treated. In-row hoeing without any herbicides is usually not efficient enough. Decision grids have been built to guide farmers in the use of these tools, according to the stage of the crop and the weeds, the soil humidity etc...An economic assessment has been made, that shows that mechanical weed control can be profitable thanks to the saving in herbicides costs, but the profitability of these techniques is very dependant on the number of hectares on which they are used.
机译:对于农艺,经济和环境的原因,农业系统中的杂草控制不能仅仅依靠选择性除草剂。在这种情况下,机械杂草控制可以是除草剂的替代或补充。努力降低生产成本,解决除草问题,除草剂解决不了是导致农民采用这些技术的原因主要有两个,但他们也表达对气候的高灵敏度和工作时间,这些技术需要担心。自2003年以来,在15名农民领域的网络中测试了三个工具,单独或与除草剂合并:连续锄头,手指除草机和旋转锄,不同类型的土壤和不同的杂草。对每个工具进行了评估的选择性:行驶中的锄头可以从油菜的第3阶段使用,直到油菜强奸覆盖排序的那一刻;手指除草在出苗前阶段,然后从阶段开始3叶;从出苗前到4-5叶的旋转锄,包括子叶阶段。手指除毛器和旋转锄头的功效非常依赖于杂草的发育阶段:当杂草有超过3叶时,它会强烈降低。在最佳条件(杂草阶段,土壤,气候等)中试验中达到了80%和更多的疗效率。机械杂草控制对杂草的效率有效,这些杂草难以用除草剂(例如杂草杂草)难以破坏。一种技术包括在播种时仅在行上喷洒除草剂,然后使用行锄头在行之间摧毁杂草。因此,除了几个表面的一部分进行处理,因此除草剂的量减少了60%。没有任何除草剂的连续锄头通常不够有效。根据作物的阶段和杂草,土壤湿度等的阶段,已经建立了决定网格,以指导农民在使用这些工具中,土壤湿度等的阶段,这表明机械杂草控制可以有利可图为了节省除草剂成本,但这些技术的盈利能力非常依赖于它们使用的公顷数量。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号