首页> 外文会议>International Conference on Human Choice and Computers >Qualitative Analysis of Interviews with Municipal Officers Toward the Human-Centered Improvement of the eLen Regulation Database System
【24h】

Qualitative Analysis of Interviews with Municipal Officers Toward the Human-Centered Improvement of the eLen Regulation Database System

机译:市政人员对人以人为本的改进的采访质量分析

获取原文

摘要

The objective of this study is to analyze results of interviews that we conducted with Japanese municipal officials who have engaged in legislative drafting and to present main issues addressed by the interviewees. Moreover, based on the results of analysis, it aims to clarify remaining problems that legislators face with during legislation, which will be necessary conditions for expanding and improving human-centered functions of e-legislation systems. Using qualitative analysis of interviews with municipal officers, this paper identifies the following four issues addressed by interviewees: (1) inconsistency among ordinances; (2) inconsistency of an ordinance; (3) insufficiency in consideration of legislative objectives and facts; (4) inadequacy of legal research. Based on the results of interview analysis, this study clarifies whether the eLen regulation database system copes with them and discusses remaining problems. Overall, it illustrates that some functions included in the eLen are helpful for diminishing those issues. However, in order to overcome the problems with which legislators face in the process of legislation, the results of this study show that it is significant to provide legislators education, such as trainings for the way to use the system and benchmarking method or for learning legislation process. Although the eLen has already implemented several instructive mechanisms, we will improve further the system so that users can learn the proper process of legislation through the usage of the system.
机译:本研究的目的是分析我们与从事立法起草的日本市政官员进行的访谈结果,并呈现受访者解决的主要问题。此外,根据分析结果,它旨在阐明立法者在立法中面临的剩余问题,这将是扩大和改善E-Lemislation系统以人为本的职能的必要条件。本文利用与市政人员采访的定性分析,确定了受访者涉及以下四项问题:(1)条例之间的不一致; (2)条例的不一致; (3)考虑立法目标和事实的不足; (4)法律研究不足。根据面试分析的结果,本研究阐明了ELEN调节数据库系统是否与他们应对并讨论其余问题。总的来说,它说明了ELEN中包含的一些功能有助于减少这些问题。然而,为了克服立法者在立法过程中面临的问题,本研究结果表明,提供立法者教育是重要的,例如使用系统和基准方法或学习立法的培训。过程。虽然ELEN已经实施了几种教学机制,但我们将进一步改进该系统,以便用户通过使用系统的使用来学习立法的正确过程。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号