【24h】

WASTE GASIFICATION – WHAT ARE DATA NEEDS?

机译:废气化 - 有什么数据需求?

获取原文

摘要

The EPA’s proposed exclusion of hazardous oil-bearing petroleum refinery secondary materials from the definition of solid waste (and thereby from RCRA hazardous waste regulations) if they are gasified can provide common-sense regulatory relief and increase energy recovery and minimize wastes. The proposed exclusion is intended to “put resource conservation and recovery” back into Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) by providing regulatory relief to enable more energy conservation and recovery, and waste minimization. The EPA has also suggested that the exclusion may be extended to various other hazardous secondary materials. Limited evaluations suggest that refinery secondary material gasification according to the conditions of the exclusion is more protective of human health and the environment than coking. However, comparisons between traditional incineration and coal gasification are not sufficient to support a broader exclusion to other secondary materials. Available data from waste gasification systems show that air emissions can be equal to or lower than the HWC MACT standards, but some areas that deserve some more data gathering include (a) transportation, handling, and storage without RCRA regulations prior to treatment, (b) destruction of hazardous organic compounds under reducing conditions, ? amounts of metals and other inorganic constituents in candidate secondary materials, and partitioning and control of those constituents during gasification, and (d) levels of hazardous air pollutants in syngas, and whether those levels would be restricted by quality requirements of the syngas end uses or by applicable emission limits (for example, for gas turbines) so that protection of human health and the environment is ensured. Compliance to the Comparable/Syngas Fuel Exclusion does not ensure protection of human health and the environment equivalent to compliance to the Hazardous Waste Combustor (HWC) Maximum Achievable Control Technology (MACT) standards. Fortunately, limited syngas composition data and calculations show that waste gasifier syngas can have impurity levels far below the limits of the Comparable/Syngas Fuel Exclusion.
机译:EPA建议从固体废物的定义中排除危险的含油石油炼油厂二级材料(从RCRA危险废物法规中),如果气化可以提供常识调节缓解和提高能量回收并最大限度地减少废物。拟议的排除旨在通过提供监管救济,“将资源保护和恢复”恢复资源保护和恢复法案(RCRA),以实现更多节能和恢复,以及浪费最小化。 EPA还建议排除可以扩展到各种其他危险的二级材料。有限的评估表明,根据排除条件的炼油厂二级材料气化比焦化更具保护人类健康和环境。然而,传统焚烧和煤气化之间的比较不足以支持更广泛排除到其他二级材料。废气化系统的可用数据表明,空气排放可以等于或低于HWC MACT标准,但一些应得更多的数据收集的领域包括(a)在治疗前没有RCRA法规的运输,处理和储存(B. )在还原条件下破坏有害物质化合物,?候选二级材料中的金属和其他无机成分,以及在气化过程中的那些成分的分配和控制,(D)合成气中的危险空气污染物水平,以及这些水平是否受到合成气端使用的质量要求的限制通过适用的排放限制(例如,用于燃气轮机),从而确保了人类健康和环境的保护。符合可比/合成气燃料排除不保证人类健康和相当于符合危险废物燃烧器(HWC)可达到的最大控制技术(MACT)标准,保护环境。幸运的是,有限的合成气组成数据和计算表明,废气装布合成气可以具有远低于可比较/合成气排斥的限制的杂质水平。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号