首页> 外文会议>Annual loss prevention symposium >Validating a Risk-Based Inspection Tool The Evolution of the API RBI Protocol
【24h】

Validating a Risk-Based Inspection Tool The Evolution of the API RBI Protocol

机译:验证基于风险的检查工具API RBI协议的演变

获取原文

摘要

Over the past few years, a group of companies working under the American Petroleum Institute have developed a risk-based inspection protocol. The original form of this protocol addressed pressure vessels and piping, and common failure mechanisms applicable to each, for chemicals common to the refining industry. Since then, the protocol has been expanded to address more failure mechanisms, new equipment items such as fired heaters, shell and tube heat exchangers, atmospheric storage tanks, and pressure relief valves, and additional chemicals. Throughout, the tool has been a relative risk-ranking method, incorporating relative measures of failure likelihood and failure consequence. In the past year, the tool has been validated and calibrated in absolute terms. This allows not only optimal allocation of a fixed number of resources, but defines the optimal level of resources in terms of actual dollars per year. This, in turn, allows rigorous cost-benefit analysis of inspection options. The API RBI protocol and the methods for validating it are presented. The implications of these findings on commonly held assumptions for equipment failure frequencies and consequence analyses used in quantitative risk assessments are also discussed.
机译:在过去的几年里,在美国石油研究所工作的一组公司制定了一个基于风险的检查议定书。本协议的原始形式寻址压力容器和管道,以及适用于各种的常见故障机制,适用于炼油行业共同的化学品。从那时起,该协议已经扩展到解决更多的故障机制,新设备项目,例如燃烧加热器,壳管热交换器,大气储罐和减压阀以及额外的化学物质。整个工具一直是一种相对风险排序方法,包括失败可能性和失败后果的相对测量。在过去的一年中,该工具已被验证并以绝对术语校准。这不仅允许最佳分配固定数量的资源,但在每年实际美元方面定义了最佳资源水平。反过来,这允许严格的考察选择成本效益分析。呈现API RBI协议和用于验证其的方法。还讨论了这些发现对常见的设备故障频率假设以及在定量风险评估中使用的后果分析的影响。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号