首页> 外文会议>Human Factors and Ergonomics Society >THE DEVELOPMENT OF A RISK ASSESSMENT MODEL FOR CARPAL TUNNEL SYNDROME (CTS): A CASE-CONTROL STUDY
【24h】

THE DEVELOPMENT OF A RISK ASSESSMENT MODEL FOR CARPAL TUNNEL SYNDROME (CTS): A CASE-CONTROL STUDY

机译:腕管综合征风险评估模型的发展(CTS):一种案例对照研究

获取原文

摘要

A risk assessment model for CTS was developed from a case-control study consisting of two case- and one control groups: (1) 25 non-work related CTS patients (NW-CTS), (2) 22 work-related CTS patients (W-CTS), and (3) 50 healthy workers (HEALTHY)having had no CTS symptom history. Personal susceptibility, psychosocial stress at work, and ergonomic hazards were surveyed by using a questionnaire directed toward CTS (reliability of each scale .7). Three logistic regression models were developed and cross-validated for (1) W-CTS/HEALTHY, (2) NW-CTS/HEALTHY, and (3) CTS/HEALTHY, resulting in 89%, 84%, and 88% of correct classification performance, respectively. While the first two models include personal and ergonomic factors, the last model does only personal factors. This suggests that injury causation of NW-CTS patients be attributable mainly to their 'high' personal susceptibility to CTS rather than exposure to adverse work conditions, while for W-CTS patients work exposure and/or personalsusceptibility cause their injury.
机译:CTS的风险评估模型是从两个案例和一个对照组组成的案例对照研究中的:(1)25个非工作相关的CTS患者(NW-CTS),(2)22名与工作相关的CTS患者( W-CTS),(3)50名健康工人(健康)没有CTS症状史。通过使用针对CTS的调查问卷(每种规模的可靠性),调查了个人敏感性,工作中的心理关注和人体工程学危害.7)。开发并交叉验证的三种逻辑回归模型(1)W-CTS /健康,(2)NW-CTS /健康,(3)CTS /健康,导致89%,84%和88%的正确分别绩效。虽然前两种型号包括个人和符合人体工程学因素,但最后的模型只有个人因素。这表明,NW-CTS患者的伤害原因主要归因于他们对CTS的“高”个人易感性而不是暴露于不利的工作条件,而对于W-CTS患者的工作暴露和/或人的Inceptibility会导致受伤。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号