首页> 外文会议>International Pipeline Conference >Advances Challenges in Purging Pipeline Sections: Field Measurements vs. 1D Purging Model
【24h】

Advances Challenges in Purging Pipeline Sections: Field Measurements vs. 1D Purging Model

机译:吹扫管道部分的进步和挑战:现场测量与1D清洗模型

获取原文

摘要

Effective purging of air out of a pipeline section before commissioning by direct displacement with natural gas has been safely practiced for decades with the recognition that flammable interfacial mixing zone between the driving gas (behind) and the air (ahead) is inevitable. In cases when the purge velocity is below a threshold dictated by the gravity current velocity (defined in AGA Purging Principles and Practices, 2001), natural gas being lighter than air can in fact ride over air being the heavier gas and short circuit the flow path to the vent at the other end of the pipe section, thus trapping behind pockets of air that could potentially introduce risk of internal explosion with subsequent damage to the pipe section and pose a safety issue to field personnel. Therefore, maintaining the purge velocity above this threshold by a good margin has been a common practice in the purging procedure to-date. In fact, maintaining the purge velocity above the threshold can be controlled by the injection press or flow, where tools and dynamic purging models have been successfully developed and proven to be useful. However, AGA recommends that the drive purge gas pressure be limited to 689 kPag (100 psig) in the inlet purge line to the pipe section to avoid the risk of detonation. In some cases when the inlet purge line is relatively small compared to the main pipe section, this limit on the purge pressure would result in gas/air interfacial velocity much lower than the threshold velocity, hence stratification will occur. This paper provides insight into the possibility of increasing the purge pressure above AGA limit to avoid stratification, while conforming to the safety aspects related to detonation. A purge model is developed to overcome the shortcoming in AGA purge software that limits the purge pressure to maximum of 689 kPag (100 psig). Field trial was conducted to validate the model which demonstrated, as a proof of concept, a successful purge procedure with purge pressure = 5517 kPag (800 psig) in NPS 1.5 purge line to purge nitrogen out of NPS 42, 5.8 km section of a pipeline.
机译:在通过与天然气的直接位移在调试之前,已经安全实践了一系列管道部分的空气,几十年来识别出驾驶气体(后面)和空气(未来)之间的易燃界面混合区是不可避免的。在吹扫速度低于由重力电流速度决定的阈值(在AGA清洗原理和实践中定义的阈值时,实际上可以越来越轻,实际上可以乘坐较重的气体和短路流动路径在管道部分另一端的通风口上,从而捕获空气口袋,可能会引入内部爆炸的风险,随后对管道部分造成的损坏,对现场人员构成了安全问题。因此,通过良好的边缘保持高于该阈值的吹扫速度是迄今吹扫过程中的常见做法。实际上,保持阈值高于阈值,可以通过喷射压力机或流量来控制,其中成功开发了工具和动态清洗模型并证明是有用的。然而,AGA建议将驱动吹扫气体压力限制在入口吹扫管线中的689 kpag(100psig)到管道部分,以避免爆炸的风险。在与主管部分相比的入口吹扫线相对较小时,对吹扫压力的这种限制会导致气/空气界面速度远低于阈值的速度,因此将发生分层。本文介绍了增加高于AGA限制以避免分层的吹扫压力的可能性,同时符合与爆炸相关的安全方面。开发了一种吹扫模型以克服AGA净化软件中的缺点,限制吹扫压力至最多689 kpag(100psig)。进行现场试验以验证所示的模型,作为概念证明,在NPS 1.5净化线中用吹扫压力= 5517kPAg(800psig)的成功吹扫程序,以吹扫管道的NPS 42,5.8km部分的氮气。 。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号