首页> 外文会议>International Conference on Cyber Warfare and Security >An Anticipatory Ethical Analysis of Offensive Cyberspace Operations
【24h】

An Anticipatory Ethical Analysis of Offensive Cyberspace Operations

机译:进攻网络空间运营的预期伦理分析

获取原文

摘要

This article presents the ethical issues using offensive cyberspace operations. Previously enshrouded in secrecy, and now becoming the new norm, countries are using offensive cyberspace operations to achieve their strategic interests. Russia has conducted multiple offensive operations targeting Estonia, Georgia and the Ukraine; Hamas has targeted Israeli targets; and Iran has been targeting U.S. targets. The response to these operations has varied; Estonia and Georgia struggled with the attacks and were unable to respond while Ukraine tried to respond but the response was inefficient. Israel's response on Hamas offensive operations was an air strike on a building with Hamas Cyber-operatives. Iran shot down a U.S. Drone over the Strait of Hormuz, and the U.S. initially intended to respond with kinetic capabilities in the form of missile strikes. However, in the last minute, the U.S. chose to respond with offensive cyberspace operations targeting the Iranian missile systems. This last-minute change of response choosing between kinetic or cyber capabilities shows a need to further investigate how offensive cyberspace operations can be used against which targets from an ethical perspective. This article applies anticipatory ethical analysis on U.S. offensive operations in the "Global Hawk"-case when Iran shot down a U.S. drone over the Strait of Hormuz. Anticipatory ethical analysis looks at emerging technologies and their potential consequences. Offensive cyberspace operations present a range of possibilities, which include lowering the risk of harm to cyber operatives' lives belonging to the responding nation. However, a response can also be kinetic. Therefore, the analysis of the "Global Hawk"-case is compared with the Israeli-air strike of the building of Hamas Cyber-operatives. The authors argue that applying anticipatory ethical analysis on offensive operations and kinetic operations assist decision makers in choosing response actions to re-establish deterrence through the use of offensive cyberspace operations.
机译:本文介绍了使用攻击性网络空间运营的道德问题。以前以保密在一起,现在正在成为新的规范,各国正在利用令人反感的网络空间业务来实现他们的战略利益。俄罗斯举办了针对爱沙尼亚,格鲁吉亚和乌克兰的多次进攻行动;哈马斯瞄准了以色列目标;伊朗一直在瞄准美国目标。对这些操作的响应变化;爱沙尼亚和格鲁吉亚在攻击中挣扎,而乌克兰试图回应的时候无法回应,但响应效率低下。以色列对哈马斯进攻作业的回应是与哈马斯网络合作的建筑物中的空中罢工。伊朗在Hormuz的海峡中击落了美国无人机,最初打算以导弹罢工的形式回应动力学能力。然而,在最后一分钟,美国选择以瞄准伊朗导弹系统的攻击性网络空间运营回应。在动力学或网络能力之间选择的最后一分钟更改选择,表明需要进一步调查如何使用来自道德观点的攻击性网络空间运算。本文适用于美国的令人反感的行动的预期道德分析 - 当伊朗在Hormuz海峡中击败美国无人机时,“全球鹰”中的进攻行动。预期的道德分析看起来的新兴技术及其潜在后果。令人反感的网络空间业务呈现了一系列可能性,包括降低对网络疗效的危害风险,属于响应国家。但是,反应也可以是动词。因此,将“全球鹰” - 箱的分析与哈马斯网络运营商建设的以色列 - 空中罢工进行了比较。作者认为,对进攻行动和动力学运营的预期道德分析协助决策者选择通过使用攻击性网络空间运营来重建威慑作用。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号