首页> 外文会议>IEEE Vehicular Networking Conference >Performance comparison between IEEE 802.11p and LTE-V2V in-coverage and out-of-coverage for cooperative awareness
【24h】

Performance comparison between IEEE 802.11p and LTE-V2V in-coverage and out-of-coverage for cooperative awareness

机译:IEEE 802.11p和LTE-V2V覆盖范围内和覆盖范围外的性能比较,以提高协作意识

获取原文

摘要

Cooperative awareness, consisting in the periodic broadcasting of messages, called beacons, to inform neighboring vehicles about maneuvers, changes of direction and other relevant mobility information, represents the core requirement to enable applications that may increase road safety and transportation efficiency. Up to few months ago, when latest 3GPP Release added to long term evolution (LTE) the support of vehicle-to-vehicle (V2V) communications, the only suitable standard was IEEE 802.11p in the U.S. and the corresponding ITS-G5 in Europe. The choice regarding the worldwide adoption of one of the two technologies is still under discussion, since both show advantages and drawbacks. In this work, we analyze IEEE 802.11p and LTE-V2V and evaluate their performance for the cooperative awareness service through simulations in a realistic highway scenario. Both in-coverage and out-of-coverage conditions are considered for LTE-V2V. Results reveal that LTE-V2V incoverage is the best solution in terms of packet reception ratio for all the considered values of beacon size and communication range. As far as the beacon update delay is concerned, we observe that LTE-V2V in-coverage still provides the best performance when small packets are transmitted, while IEEE 802.11p gives the best results for values of the communication range higher than 100 m when the packet size is increased.
机译:合作意识包括周期性广播称为信标的消息,以告知邻近车辆操纵,方向变化和其他相关的移动性信息,这是实现可提高道路安全性和运输效率的应用程序的核心要求。直到几个月前,当最新的3GPP版本将长期支持(LTE)添加到车辆到车辆(V2V)通信的支持时,唯一合适的标准是美国的IEEE 802.11p和欧洲的相应ITS-G5 。关于这两种技术之一在全球范围内采用的选择仍在讨论中,因为两者都有优点和缺点。在这项工作中,我们分析了IEEE 802.11p和LTE-V2V,并通过在现实的高速公路场景中进行仿真,评估了它们在合作意识服务中的性能。对于LTE-V2V,考虑覆盖范围内和覆盖范围外两种情况。结果表明,就信标大小和通信范围的所有考虑值而言,就分组接收率而言,LTE-V2V覆盖率是最佳解决方案。就信标更新延迟而言,我们观察到LTE-V2V覆盖范围在传输小数据包时仍可提供最佳性能,而当传输范围大于100 m时,IEEE 802.11p可获得最佳结果。数据包大小增加。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号