【24h】

A Usability Testing Comparing Two Mobile Phone Gimbals

机译:比较两个手机万向节的可用性测试

获取原文

摘要

In this study, we compared two Mobile Phone Gimbals from DJI and MOZA to investigate usability issues and access which product has better usability and provide iterative recommendations for Mobile Phone Gimbal. The study was conducted from May to June 2019 based on the principle of effectiveness, efficiency and satisfaction in ISO 9241-11. Then the usability test was carried out in three parts: task design, test exclusion and data statistic. 6 subjects were asked to complete five tasks with two gimbals following the principle of think aloud protocols and given a short interview to measure their satisfaction. Results indicate that there is a usability issue of installing and balancing in novice users in both products. OSMO has simple buttons, which is easier for the novice, but users have to tap the screen of mobile phone to complete some tasks. On the contrary, MOZA enables users to operate with single hand all the time by more buttons, but it is too complicated for the novice.
机译:在本研究中,我们比较了DJI和MOZA的两个Mobile Gimbal,以调查可用性问题和访问哪种产品具有更好的可用性,并为Mobile Gimbal提供迭代建议。这项研究是根据ISO 9241-11中的有效性,效率和满意度原则于2019年5月至6月进行的。然后,可用性测试分为三个部分:任务设计,测试排除和数据统计。按照大声思考协议的原则,要求6名受试者用两个平衡架完成五个任务,并进行了简短的访谈以衡量他们的满意度。结果表明这两个产品中的新手用户都存在安装和平衡的可用性问题。 OSMO具有简单的按钮,对于新手来说比较容易,但是用户必须点击手机的屏幕才能完成某些任务。相反,MOZA可使用户始终通过更多按钮来单手操作,但对于新手来说太复杂了。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号