首页> 外文会议>ASME Pressure Vessels Piping Conference >ASME XI - RSE-M: GENERAL COMPARISON OF FLAW EVALUATION RULES
【24h】

ASME XI - RSE-M: GENERAL COMPARISON OF FLAW EVALUATION RULES

机译:ASME XI-RSE-M:缺陷评估规则的一般比较

获取原文

摘要

After a short review of the 2 Codes in term of flaw evaluation, this paper will compare Scope, Standards, Methods, Material Properties, Structural Factors of 2 major International In-service Codes: ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Codes -Section XI - "Rules for In-service Inspection of Nuclear Facility Components", 2017 Edition and RSE-M "In-Service Inspection Rules for Mechanical Components of PWR Nuclear Island", 2017 Edition. The cracked components are evaluated by dedicated engineering methods: comparison of fracture mechanic parameters (K/ Kcp, J, C*...) with material properties (toughness K_(IC), J_(IC), J resistance curve...) associated to structural factors for margins evaluation. The comparison will consider mainly Appendices A, C of ASME Section XI and Appendix 5 of RSE-M (Appendices 5.0 to 5.8) To conclude, the paper will discuss gaps, needs, ongoing and future developments of both Codes, like Warm-pre stressing, Master Curve, Leak Before Break....
机译:在就缺陷评估方面对这两个代码进行了简短回顾之后,本文将比较两种主要国际使用代码(ASME锅炉和压力容器代码-第XI节-“规则”)的范围,标准,方法,材料特性,结构因素。 《核设施部件在役检查规则》(2017年版)和RSE-M《压水堆核岛机械组件在役检查规则》(2017年版)。通过专门的工程方法评估破裂的组件:将断裂力学参数(K / Kcp,J,C * ...)与材料特性(韧性K_(IC),J_(IC),J电阻曲线...)进行比较。与利润率评估的结构性因素相关联。比较将主要考虑ASME第XI节的附录A,C和RSE-M的附录5(附录5.0至5.8)。总而言之,本文将讨论这两个规范的差距,需求,持续和未来的发展,如预热强调,主曲线,断裂前泄漏...

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号