首页> 外文会议>IEEE International Symposium on Innovation and Entrepreneurship >Cost Reduction First or Innovation First? Latecomer Firms’ Technology Catching-up Strategy Selection
【24h】

Cost Reduction First or Innovation First? Latecomer Firms’ Technology Catching-up Strategy Selection

机译:降低成本优先还是创新优先?后来者企业的技术追赶战略选择

获取原文

摘要

Based on the composition-based view (CBV), this paper studies the effect of cost-oriented and innovation-oriented catching-up strategies on the performance of latecomer firms by taking 249 A-share listed firms in the communication and electronic equipment manufacturing industry as samples. In addition, the paper examines the moderating effect of the technological knowledge stock on the relationship between the choice of catching-up strategy and the performance of latecomer firms. The study has found that the more the latecomer firms focus on reducing costs, the higher the performance; the more the latecomer firms emphasize innovation, the lower the performance. In addition, the high technological knowledge stock of latecomer firms can weaken the positive relationship between the cost-oriented strategy and the firm performance, but it has no effect on the negative relationship between the innovation-oriented strategy and the firm performance. The research results have a certain reference value for the selection of catching-up strategies of latecomer firms.
机译:基于基于组合的观点(CBV),本文以通信和电子设备制造业的249家A股上市公司为研究对象,研究了成本导向和创新导向的追赶策略对后发公司业绩的影响。作为样品。此外,本文研究了技术知识存量对追赶策略选择与后发企业绩效之间关系的调节作用。该研究发现,后来者公司越关注降低成本,其绩效就越高。后来者公司越强调创新,其绩效就越低。此外,后发企业的高技术知识存量可以削弱成本导向战略与企业绩效之间的正向关系,但对创新导向战略与企业绩效之间的负相关关系没有影响。研究结果对后发企业追赶策略的选择具有一定的参考价值。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号