首页> 外文会议>ASME turbo expo: turbine technical conference and exposition >TURBULENT ENERGY BUDGET IN A TIP LEAKAGE FLOW: A COMPARISON BETWEEN RANS AND LES
【24h】

TURBULENT ENERGY BUDGET IN A TIP LEAKAGE FLOW: A COMPARISON BETWEEN RANS AND LES

机译:尖峰泄漏流中的湍流能量预算:Rans和les之间的比较

获取原文

摘要

An academic configuration of a single airfoil and a flat casing with clearance, put in the potential core of a jet at Re_c = 9.3 × 10~5, is studied in order to analyse the turbulence modelling. A zonal large-eddy simulation (ZLES), validated against experimental results, is considered as a reference to evaluate two steady Reynolds-averaged Navier-Stokes (RANS) simulations. Both RANS simulations use the original Wilcox k - ω model. They differ on the constitutive relation: one uses the classical Boussinesq constitutive relation, while the other relies on the quadratic constitutive relation (QCR). The analysis focuses on the mean velocities, the Reynolds stresses and a term-to-term decomposition of the turbulent kinetic energy budget on a plane through the clearance. RANS represents quite well the mean velocities, but under-estimates the Reynolds stresses, thus under-estimates every turbulent kinetic energy budget term. The QCR has little effect on the flow and the turbulent quantities. The method allowed a fine analysis of the physics of the turbulence.
机译:为了分析湍流模型,研究了一种单一翼型和一个带有间隙的扁平壳体的理论配置,该结构被放置在Re_c = 9.3×10〜5的射流的潜在核心中。根据实验结果验证的区域大涡模拟(ZLES)被认为是评估两个雷诺平均纳维-斯托克斯(RANS)稳态模拟的参考。两种RANS仿真都使用原始的Wilcox k-ω模型。它们在本构关系上有所不同:一种使用经典的Boussinesq本构关系,而另一种则依赖于二次本构关系(QCR)。分析着重于平均速度,雷诺应力以及通过间隙的平面上湍流动能收支的逐项分解。 RANS很好地代表了平均速度,但是低估了雷诺应力,因此低估了每个湍动能预算项。 QCR对流量和湍流量影响很小。该方法可以很好地分析湍流的物理性质。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号