首页> 外文会议>International symposium on remote sensing;ISRS >SENSITTVITYAND RELIABILITY ANALYSIS OF ESTIMATION PROCEDURES OF UNOBSERVED TRIGGER FACTOR FOR LANDSLIDE HAZARD MAPPING
【24h】

SENSITTVITYAND RELIABILITY ANALYSIS OF ESTIMATION PROCEDURES OF UNOBSERVED TRIGGER FACTOR FOR LANDSLIDE HAZARD MAPPING

机译:滑坡危险性映射不可观测触发因子的估计过程的敏感性和可靠性分析

获取原文

摘要

For better supporting landslide hazard zonation, this paper presents a sensitivity and reliability analysis of estimation procedures of unobserved trigger factor (i.e., latent variable) on landslide occurrences based on Structural Equation Modeling (SEM) approach. Through a measurement equation in the path diagram defined between the trigger factor and causal factors, the scores of unobserved trigger factor are estimated, that are delineated on a Trigger Factor Influence (TFI) map. As the sensitivity and reliability analysis of estimation procedures, let us consider the following models: i)Model A: using Maximum Likelihood estimation (ML) and Generalized Least Squares (GLS) to estimate the parameters in the path diagram and the latent valuable scores of trigger factor, respectively; and ii)Model B: using ML and GLS to the same as above. The experimental results are summarized as follows: i)Based on the statistical fit measures (i.e., GFI, AGFI, and RMSEA), both Models can be accepted and; ii)The success rates of Model A with respect to training data are higher than that of Model B. Those results corroborate that the higher the trigger factor value of Model A, the more hazardous the subarea affected by landslide occurrences. As a final outcome, the differences of trigger factor values between Models A and B are delineated on the difference map (DIF map). Based on the above quantitative evaluation results, the pixels on the DIF map that indicate the difference values of "Model A > Model B" and "Model A < Model B" can be interpreted as "reliable- and unreliable-side assessment" subareas, respectively. Such approach on sensitivity and reliability analysis is effective in estimating unobserved trigger factor for landslide hazard mapping.
机译:为了更好地支持滑坡灾害分区,本文基于结构方程模型(SEM)方法对滑坡发生时未观测到的触发因素(即潜在变量)的估算程序进行了敏感性和可靠性分析。通过在触发因素和因果之间定义的路径图中的测量方程,可以估算未观察到的触发因素的分数,并在触发因素影响(TFI)映射图上进行描述。作为估计程序的敏感性和可靠性分析,让我们考虑以下模型:i)模型A:使用最大似然估计(ML)和广义最小二乘(GLS)来估计路径图中的参数和潜在的潜在价值触发因素分别; ii)模型B:使用ML和GLS的方法与上述相同。实验结果总结如下:i)基于统计拟合度量(即,GFI,AGFI和RMSEA),两种模型都可以被接受;并且ii)在训练数据方面,模型A的成功率高于模型B。这些结果证实,模型A的触发因子值越高,受滑坡发生影响的分区越危险。作为最终结果,模型A和模型B之间的触发因子值的差异在差异图(DIF图)上进行了描述。根据上述定量评估结果,DIF映射上指示“模型A>模型B”和“模型A <模型B”之差值的像素可以解释为“可靠和不可靠评估”子区域,分别。这种敏感性和可靠性分析方法可有效地估计滑坡灾害成图的未观察到的触发因素。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号