首页> 外文会议>ASME Pressure Vessels and Piping conference >ANALYTICAL COMPARISON BETWEEN SEPARATE REINFORCEMENT NOZZLE AND INTEGRAL REINFORCEMENT NOZZLE BEHAVIORS UNDER CYCLIC LOADING
【24h】

ANALYTICAL COMPARISON BETWEEN SEPARATE REINFORCEMENT NOZZLE AND INTEGRAL REINFORCEMENT NOZZLE BEHAVIORS UNDER CYCLIC LOADING

机译:循环荷载作用下单独补强喷嘴与整体补强喷嘴性能的分析比较

获取原文

摘要

ASME code explicitly addresses design for fatigue due to pressure or temperature cycles. Protection against fatigue failure due to cyclic external mechanical loads (e.g. piping loads) is not tackled in depth. This paper provides a less-tedious yet fit-for-purpose approach to evaluate the effect of cyclic external mechanical loads as well as the pressure fluctuations -as a result of piping slug flow- on nozzles fatigue life. The evaluation compares between two types of nozzles construction (configuration); separate reinforcement nozzle and readily radiographed (lip type) integrally reinforced nozzle. Within the analysis, a unity fatigue damage ratio or exceeding the ratcheting allowable limits was selected as the indication for the inadequacy of the reinforcement configuration. COMPRESS~® FEA software results comprehensively predict that the separate reinforcement nozzles can't withstand the imposed cyclic loads since the accumulated fatigue damage are greater than 1 (one) implying that the nozzle will experience fatigue failure before the end of its life time. COMPRESS~® FEA results were examined at four locations, namely "shell next to nozzle", "nozzle next to shell", "nozzle thickness transition" and "shell away from nozzle". The maximum stress of the four locations was always at "shell next to nozzle". These results have been verified against SOLIDWORKS~® simulation FEA results. The results show that the separate reinforcement nozzle construction, although adequate for static loadings, has less fatigue life compared to the integral reinforcement nozzle construction. Moreover, progressive distortion of the non-integral (separate) reinforcement connection is predicted showing that the mating members may become loose at the end of each complete operating cycle which could eventually cause disengagement. Additionally, the results support ASME 2004, Ⅷ-2 para. 5-112 recommendations in prohibiting fillet welds in joints of category D for components subject to fatigue service. The paper concludes the advantage of integral reinforced readily radiographed nozzle construction in protection against fatigue failure and ratcheting and also provides a roadmap for simplified fatigue analysis using commercially available software.
机译:ASME规范明确解决了因压力或温度循环而引起的疲劳设计。不能解决由于周期性外部机械负载(例如管道负载)导致的疲劳失效的保护措施。本文提供了一种不太繁琐但又适合目的的方法,用于评估循环外部机械负载的影响以及由于管道塞流导致的压力波动对喷嘴疲劳寿命的影响。该评估在两种类型的喷嘴构造(配置)之间进行比较;单独的增强喷嘴和易于射线照相的(唇型)整体增强喷嘴。在分析中,选择统一的疲劳损伤率或超过棘轮允许极限作为钢筋配置不充分的指示。 COMPRESS〜®FEA软件的结果全面预测,由于累积的疲劳损伤大于1(一),因此单独的增强喷嘴不能承受施加的循环载荷,这意味着喷嘴在使用寿命到期之前会遭受疲劳破坏。在四个位置检查了COMPRESS〜®FEA结果,即“喷嘴旁边的外壳”,“喷嘴旁边的喷嘴”,“喷嘴厚度过渡”和“外壳远离喷嘴”。四个位置的最大应力始终位于“喷嘴旁的外壳”处。这些结果已针对SOLIDWORKS〜®模拟FEA结果进行了验证。结果表明,与整体式加固喷嘴结构相比,单独的加固喷嘴结构虽然足以承受静态载荷,但其疲劳寿命较短。此外,预计非整体的(单独的)加强连接会逐渐变形,这表明配合构件在每个完整的工作循环结束时可能会松动,最终可能导致脱开。此外,结果支持ASME 2004,Ⅷ-2段。第5-112条关于为疲劳工作部件禁止在D类接头中进行角焊的建议。本文总结了整体增强的易于射线照相的喷嘴结构在防止疲劳失效和棘轮方面的优势,并提供了使用市售软件简化疲劳分析的路线图。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号