首页> 外文会议>International conference on construction and real estate management >Costs of Acoustics versus Overall Weil-Being in Elementary Classrooms: Who Is the Winner and Why? What Could Be Done for Acoustical Transformation in Classrooms?
【24h】

Costs of Acoustics versus Overall Weil-Being in Elementary Classrooms: Who Is the Winner and Why? What Could Be Done for Acoustical Transformation in Classrooms?

机译:初中教室的声学成本与总体成本:谁是赢家,为什么?教室中的声音转换可以做什么?

获取原文

摘要

Literature suggests that acoustic treatments for classrooms are disregarded because costs of acoustic treatments are calculable and costs of lack of acoustical treatments are incalculable. Researchers suggest that this problem can be addressed only if a proper economic study of classroom acoustics could be performed where extra costs of acoustics is justified by its economic benefit. This researcher agrees with the previous research and suggests life cycle value (LCV) assessment of classroom acoustics. The researcher is developing a LCV evaluation model for classroom acoustics based on the principles and theories of multi criteria decision making (MCDM). The outcome is expected to help offset the current practice of initial-cost decision making, because additional costs per new classroom for good acoustical performance is not high, ranging from $1500 to $4500. But the problem is that what gets measured gets taken care of during the cost-cutting business when a new school comes in over budget.
机译:文献表明,教室的声学治疗可忽略不计,因为声学治疗的成本是可以计算的,而缺乏声学治疗的成本是无法计算的。研究人员建议,只有在对教室声学进行适当的经济研究且其经济利益证明其额外成本合理的情况下,才能解决此问题。该研究人员同意之前的研究,并建议对教室声学进行生命周期价值(LCV)评估。研究人员正在基于多准则决策(MCDM)的原理和理论,开发一种用于教室声学的LCV评估模型。预期结果将有助于抵消当前的初始成本决策做法,因为每个新教室要获得良好的声学性能所产生的额外成本并不高,从1500美元到4500美元不等。但是问题是,当一所新学校的预算超出预算时,在削减成本的过程中,所测量的内容会得到照顾。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号