首页> 外文会议>ASME turbo expo: turbine technical conference and exposition >FAN BLADE DESIGN METHODS: CASCADE VERSUS ISOLATED AIRFOIL APPROACH - EXPERIMENTAL AND NUMERICAL COMPARISON
【24h】

FAN BLADE DESIGN METHODS: CASCADE VERSUS ISOLATED AIRFOIL APPROACH - EXPERIMENTAL AND NUMERICAL COMPARISON

机译:风扇叶片设计方法:级联与孤立的机翼方法-实验和数值比较

获取原文

摘要

Both cascade and isolated airfoil methods are considered valid in axial fan blade design, for high (σ approx> 1) and low (σ approx< 0.7) solidities respectively. For bladings that feature intermediate solidities the modified isolated approach is commonly employed. This method uses isolated airfoil data, with proper adjustments to take into account multiplane interference effects. Contrarily, the literature does not refer about modifications of the cascade approach to design medium solidity fans. Such method would use cascade data, properly adjusted for the blade sections at lower solidities. Thus, with the aim of comparing these two opposite design approaches (modified cascade versus modified isolated) for medium solidity blades, two free-vortex blading were designed for a 315 mm rotor-only axial fan and experimentally tested. CFD analyses were performed as well to obtain the local flow features. NACA-65 series airfoils were employed, as both cascade and isolated data are available for chord Reynolds numbers typical of axial fans applications. Results highlight the differences between the two approaches. Finally, a mixed approach that employs both isolated and cascade data is suggested as the most accurate one. Moreover, results also show the detrimental effects of the low chord Reynolds numbers on the performance of the blades. This effect should be taken into account in blade design for small-to-medium size machines.
机译:级联和隔离翼型方法在轴流风机叶片设计中均被认为是有效的,分别适用于高(σ约> 1)和低(σ约<0.7)的固体。对于具有中等强度的叶片,通常采用改进的隔离方法。该方法使用孤立的机翼数据,并进行适当调整以考虑多平面干扰效应。相反,文献没有涉及对级联方法的修改以设计中等强度的风扇。这种方法将使用级联数据,并针对较低硬度的叶片部分进行适当调整。因此,为了比较中等强度叶片的这两种相反的设计方法(改进的级联与改进的隔离式),针对仅315 mm转子的轴流风机设计了两种自由涡旋叶片,并进行了实验测试。还执行CFD分析以获得局部流动特征。使用NACA-65系列机翼,因为级联和隔离数据均可获得轴流风机应用中典型的弦雷诺数。结果突出了两种方法之间的差异。最后,建议同时使用隔离数据和级联数据的混合方法是最准确的方法。此外,结果还显示了低弦雷诺数对叶片性能的有害影响。在中小型机器的刀片设计中应考虑到这种影响。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号