首页> 外文会议>Conference on Applied Optics and Photonics China >Computer controlled optical surfacing technology research of mid-spatial frequency errors on large-aperture planar optical components
【24h】

Computer controlled optical surfacing technology research of mid-spatial frequency errors on large-aperture planar optical components

机译:大孔径平面光学组件中空间频率误差的计算机控制光学浮出技术研究

获取原文

摘要

Based on the theoretical model of small-tool polishing, this paper studied the influence of polishing parameters on the results of computer controlled optical surfacing. We compared different parameters of the removal function and the tool path and analyzed the residual mid-spatial frequency errors in the polishing process. The simulation results indicated that raster path combined with Gaussian removal function, contributing to high accuracy of PSD 1 RMS, but leading to serious peaks of 1D PSD1 curves in some frequency points. In contrast, pseudo-random path combined with flat-topped removal function, resulting in lower accuracy of PSD1 RMS, but could effectively restrain the amplitude of the ID PSD1 curves. Finally, experimental study was carried out on both of the 610 mm × 440 mm K9 material transmission mirror and 430 mm × 430 mm fused silica plane window, the RMS value of PSD1 converged from 3.72 nm to 1.61 nm, and decreased from 2.30 nm to 1.37 nm, respectively, which demonstrated the correctness of the model.
机译:基于小型工具抛光的理论模型,本文研究了抛光参数对计算机控制光学表面的结果的影响。我们比较了去除功能和刀具路径的不同参数,并分析了抛光过程中的残余中间空间频率误差。仿真结果表明,光栅路径与高斯去除函数相结合,有助于PSD 1 rms的高精度,但导致一些频率点的1D PSD1曲线的严重峰。相反,伪随机路径与平顶去除功能组合,导致PSD1 RMS的较低精度,但可以有效地抑制ID PSD1曲线的幅度。最后,在610mm×440mm K9材料透射镜和430mm×430mm熔融二氧化硅平面窗口中进行了实验研究,PSD1的RMS值从3.72nm收敛到1.61nm,从2.30 nm降低分别为1.37纳米,证明了模型的正确性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号